Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Patterson v. Wu Family Corp., 608 N.W.2d 863.

91 citing documents.

Thorson v. Zollinger Dental, P.A. 728 N.W.2d 261 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(stating “[t]he determination of whether personal jurisdiction exists is ...
COMMANDEUR LLC v. Howard Hartry, Inc. 724 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 2006
COMMANDEUR LLC v. Howard Hartry, Inc. 724 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 2006
The Rules of Civil Procedure “reflect a preference that actions be determined on the merits,” and “the rules are to be liberally construed so as to serve the interests of justice,” Larson v. Indep.
Marriage of Reed v. Albaaj 723 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Marriage of Reed v. Albaaj 723 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Mercer v. Andersen 715 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Mercer v. Andersen 715 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-68 (Minn.2000) (addressing circumstances under which defendant involuntarily waives defense of lack of personal jurisdiction).
In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.T.B. 710 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.T.B. 710 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Hanson v. Woolston 701 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Hanson v. Woolston 701 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(holding that defendant waived jurisdiction by moving for summary judgment); Comm’r. of Natural Resources v. Nicollet County Pub.
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co. 683 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 2004
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co. 683 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 2004
(holding that participation in discovery does not waive jurisdictional defenses).
Roehrdanz v. Brill 682 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 2004
Roehrdanz v. Brill 682 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 2004
Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. 676 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 2004
Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. 676 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 2004
Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp. 670 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp. 670 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
P. 12.08 (addressing waiver of objection to lack of personal jurisdiction); -68 (Minn.2000) (same).
Vlahos v. R & I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. 658 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Vlahos v. R & I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. 658 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.C. 656 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.C. 656 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Amdahl v. Stonewall Ins.
Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P. 644 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2002
Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P. 644 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 2002
Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. Jag Investments, Inc. 634 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 2001
Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. Jag Investments, Inc. 634 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 2001
Commissioner of Natural Resources v. Nicollet County Public Water/Wetlands Hearings Unit 633 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Commissioner of Natural Resources v. Nicollet County Public Water/Wetlands Hearings Unit 633 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In addition, rule 12.08 does not “preclude waiver by implication.” (holding that a defendant waives the defense of insufficient service of process, despite asserting the defense by answer, by affirmatively invoking the jurisdiction of the district court to obtain partial summary judgment without earlier or simultaneously moving to dismiss the complaint for insuffici
Holm v. Casino Resource Corp. 632 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Holm v. Casino Resource Corp. 632 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“We review de novo the construction of a rule of court procedure.” (citation omitted).
In Re the Welfare of T.D. 631 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Welfare of T.D. 631 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Uthe v. Baker 629 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Uthe v. Baker 629 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc. 618 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc. 618 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., review denied (Minn. July 16, 1992); see, (reviewing de novo waiver of insufficient service of process defense).
Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. JAG INVESTMENTS, INC. 609 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. JAG INVESTMENTS, INC. 609 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
A recent Minnesota Supreme Court case, found waiver in a case with similar facts.