Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Berreman v. West Publishing Co., 615 N.W.2d 362.

37 citing documents.

In re the Supervised Estate of Mary Catherine Swartout, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Breach of fiduciary duties “Whether a fiduciary duty has been breached generally is a question of fact.” Berreman v. W. Publ’g Co., rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Serene E. Warren, as beneficiary of the 2011 Arizona NG Trust 102, 8008 Meadow Trust 102, 2011 Lafayette … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Berreman v. W. Publ’g Co., rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re: Estate of Maryetta Louise Andrews. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Whether a fiduciary duty has been bre ached generally is a question of fact.” Berreman v. W. Publ’g Co., rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Dr. Eric Steffen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Paul Nelsen, Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“ Whether a fiduciary duty has been breached generally is a question of fact.” Berreman v. W. Pub l’g Co., , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Gerring Properties Inc., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1 (describing relief as equitable), Berreman v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Kathryn Ward Blum, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Co. , 73 (Minn. App. 2000), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Jeffery D. Gordon, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Berreman v. West Pub l’g Co., d 362, 367 (Minn. App. 2000) , review denied (Minn. Sept.
A18-0391 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
frustrates the reasonable expectations of shareholders in their capacity as shareholders.” Berreman v. W. Publ’g Co., d 362, 374 (Minn. App. 2000), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Lund v. Lund 924 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Lund v. Lund 924 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. , , 374 (Minn. App. 2000), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Blum v. Thompson 901 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Blum v. Thompson 901 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., , 379 & n.10 (Minn. 2011) ( review denied (Minn. Sept.
Robert Kagel v. Christian Brackey, Kagel Acquisition Company, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Robert Kagel v. Christian Brackey, Kagel Acquisition Company, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Berreman v. W. Publ’g Co., (“The term 7 ‘unfairly prejudicial’ should be liberally construed.”), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Joy Folie v. Aging Joyfully, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Joy Folie v. Aging Joyfully, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Berreman v. West Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Scott R. McKee, M. D. v. St. Paul Eye Clinic, P. A. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Scott R. McKee, M. D. v. St. Paul Eye Clinic, P. A. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Berreman v. West Publ’g Co., -71 (Minn. App. 2000), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Gerald J. Hansen v. N'compass Solutions Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gerald J. Hansen v. N'compass Solutions Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Berreman v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Samuel Deweese, (A13-2152), (A13-2160) v. Lakeview Clinic, Ltd., (A13-2152), (A13-2160). Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Samuel Deweese, (A13-2152), (A13-2160) v. Lakeview Clinic, Ltd., (A13-2152), (A13-2160). Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Whether a fiduciary duty has been breached generally is a question of fact.” Berreman v. West Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 814 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 814 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
But this ability, if acted on, would likely have been illusory at best and made Kathy immediately liable to repay the corporation since “it is well established that shareholders in a close corporation owe a fiduciary duty to one another.” Berreman v. West Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 802 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2011
U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 802 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2011
§ 302A.751 in Berreman v. W. Publ’g Co.
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 788 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 788 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
The statute does not define unfairly prejudicial conduct, but this court has construed the term to encompass “conduct that frustrates the reasonable expectations *167 of shareholders in their capacity as shareholders or directors of a corporation that is not publicly held or as officers or employees of a closely held corporation.” Berreman v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Jane Doe 43C v. Diocese of New Ulm 787 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Jane Doe 43C v. Diocese of New Ulm 787 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“[S]ilence does not constitute fraud in the absence of a duty to speak.” Berreman v. W. Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Bolander v. Bolander 703 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bolander v. Bolander 703 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Berreman v. West Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Professionals, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Professionals, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Berreman v. West Publ’g. Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Relying on Berreman v. West Publ’g Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.