Cited by

(violating court orders); (collection of improper fees); (conflicts of interest).

Roach’s misconduct harmed the legal profession because it “subjects the profession to severe scrutiny and criticism and contributes to the public’s general mistrust of attorneys.”

(concluding that attorney ’s misconduct involving dishonesty harmed “the legal profession by undermining the public confidence in the honesty and integrity of lawyers”); In re Geiger , (concluding that attorney’s misconduct, including charging unr easonable fees, “subjects th e profession to severe scrutiny and criticism and contributes to the pub lic’s general mistrust of attorneys”).

Finally, “[e]ven where no single act of misconduct standing alone warrants severe public discipline, the cumulative weight and severity of multiple disciplinary rule violations may compel such discipline.”

See, e.g., In re Panel Case No. 35104, (holding that a panel of the Lawyer's Professional Responsibility Board acted arbitrarily and capriciously because it did not consider the lawyer’s "misconduct as a whole” when it determined what discipline was appropriate); ("Even where no single act of misconduct standing alone warrants severe public discipline, the cumulative weight and severity of multiple disciplinary rule violations may compel such discipline.").

See, (stating that “[e]ven where no single act of misconduct standing alone warrants severe public discipline, the cumulative weight and severity of multiple disciplinary rule violations may compel such discipline”)

Additionally, “[e]ven where no single act of misconduct standing alone warrants severe public discipline, the cumulative weight and severity of multiple disciplinary rule violations may compel such discipline.”

See, -24 (Minn.2001) (indefinitely suspending an attorney who engaged in a pattern of client neglect and incompetence, entered into several improper fee agreements, and failed to supervise subordinate attorneys).

We have suspended or disbarred attorneys “[e]ven in cases where an attorney is involved in only one instance of client neglect, when that neglect is combined with other violations.”

(“Even in cases where an attorney is *541 involved in only one instance of client neglect, when that neglect is combined with other violations we have often suspended or disbarred the attorney.”); (“Repeated neglect of client matters, misrepresentations

“Even where no single act of misconduct standing alone warrants severe public discipline, the cumulative weight and severity of multiple disciplinary rule violations may compel such discipline.”

Rules 12(c) & 13(b), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR).

Typically, this court imposes an “indefinite suspension in cases involving a continued pattern of client neglect when no evidence of mitigating circumstances is present.”

In In re Geiger, this court noted that “[e]ven in cases where an attorney is involved in only one instance of client neglect, when that neglect is combined with other violations we have often suspended *782 or disbarred the attorney.”

See Rules 12(c) & 13(b), RLPR