Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Braith v. Fischer, 632 N.W.2d 716.

112 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Rebekah L. Bennett, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
7 77 (Minn. App. 2017); review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Procedural and evidentiary rulings ar e within the district court’s discretion and are also reviewed under an a buse-of-discretion standard.” d 716, 721 (Minn. App. 2001), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Matter of: Birch Benjamin Hansen v. Suzanne Christine Todnem 891 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Birch Benjamin Hansen v. Suzanne Christine Todnem 891 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating insubstantial modification does not require evidentiary hearing and is appropriate if modification serves child’s best interests), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of: Bret William Smith v. Timothy Patrick Lyons Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of: Bret William Smith v. Timothy Patrick Lyons Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Dawn Nyakundi v. Gilbert Ogamba Nyakundi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Dawn Nyakundi v. Gilbert Ogamba Nyakundi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Because father did not present this argument to the district court, it is not properly before us. Thiele, d at 582; (refusing, under Thiele, to address a claim of district court bias), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Marriage of: Reno L. Brandt v. Jessie J. Johnson, f/k/a Jessie J. Brandt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Reno L. Brandt v. Jessie J. Johnson, f/k/a Jessie J. Brandt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Grefe Construction, Inc. v. Double J Concrete & Masonry, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Grefe Construction, Inc. v. Double J Concrete & Masonry, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Ivan Kotten Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Ivan Kotten Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-25 (Minn. App. 2001) (), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Appointment of a parenting time expeditor must be conducted following the statutory procedures set out in Minn. Stat. § 518.1751.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Louise Constantini v. Brent John Constantini Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Louise Constantini v. Brent John Constantini Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The district court is granted broad discretion to determine what is in the best interests of the child when it comes to [parenting time,] and we will not overturn its determination absent an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
J. T. S. v. S. L. v. B. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Estate of Harry L. Housker, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Estate of Harry L. Housker, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Oct.
J. T. S. v. S. L. v. B. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
P. 52.01 (“[D]ue regard shall be given to the opportunity of the [district] court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.”); (stating that “the district court is in the best position to judge the credibility of the witnesses and make determinations in the face of conflicting testimony and must be given due deference”), 3 The district court specifically found that mother’s allegations regarding the upkeep of fathe
Thomas C. Rubey v. Valerie A. Vannett Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re Guardianship of Charles Rottelo, Ward. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Thomas C. Rubey v. Valerie A. Vannett Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Procedural and evidentiary rulings are within the district court’s discretion and are also reviewed under an abuse-of-discretion standard.” d 716, 721 (Minn. App. 2001), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re Guardianship of Charles Rottelo, Ward. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-25 (Minn. App. 2001) (), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Pettey v. Melissa Denise Pettey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Pettey v. Melissa Denise Pettey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that, to prevail on appeal, a party must show error and that error caused prejudice); (citing rule 61 and Midway Ctr.
In re the Matter of Boyd Jacob Phelps v. Lynnea Diana Sterling Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of Boyd Jacob Phelps v. Lynnea Diana Sterling Minn. Ct. App. 2015
hat the custody evaluator was “prejudicially tainted by Cross.” To the extent that Sterling challenges the district court’s credibility determinations, we must defer to the district court because “the district court is in the best position to judge the credibility of the witnesses and make determinations in the face of conflicting testimony and must be given due deference.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Cheryl Kaufenberg v. The Winkley Company d/b/a Winkley Orthotics & Prosthetics Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Cheryl Kaufenberg v. The Winkley Company d/b/a Winkley Orthotics & Prosthetics Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Ahmadani Hassan Mohamed v. Eric Elijah Aaron Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ahmadani Hassan Mohamed v. Eric Elijah Aaron Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Michael Charles Sasse, f/k/a Michael Charles Sasse Penkert v. Kathryn Elizabeth Penkert, f/k/a Delight Bernice Penkert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael Charles Sasse, f/k/a Michael Charles Sasse Penkert v. Kathryn Elizabeth Penkert, f/k/a Delight Bernice Penkert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
12 “The district court is granted broad discretion to determine what is in the best interests of the child when it comes to visitation and we will not overturn its determination absent an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Myon Demarlo Burrell v. State of Minnesota 858 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2015
Myon Demarlo Burrell v. State of Minnesota 858 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Peiliang Yuan v. Te Hao, and In re the Matter of: Te Hao … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Peiliang Yuan v. Te Hao, and In re the Matter of: Te Hao … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
And “the district court is in the best position to judge the credibility of the witnesses and make determinations in the face of conflicting testimony and must be given due deference.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Marriage of: Becki Anne Suleski, f/k/a Becki Anne Rupe v. Ryan Michael Rupe 855 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Becki Anne Suleski, f/k/a Becki Anne Rupe v. Ryan Michael Rupe 855 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.”) (quoting Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495, −65 (1944)); (applying Loth).
Jeffrey Philip Dawson v. Sara Rhea Taylor, County of Dakota, Intervenor. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jeffrey Philip Dawson v. Sara Rhea Taylor, County of Dakota, Intervenor. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Sergey Porada, Yelena Kurdyumova v. Terry I. Monroe, Marc L. Kruger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Sergey Porada, Yelena Kurdyumova v. Terry I. Monroe, Marc L. Kruger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Matter of: Ronald Lee Kish v. Kimberly Sue Wirth Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Matter of: Ronald Lee Kish v. Kimberly Sue Wirth Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Oct.