Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hogetvedt, 623 N.W.2d 909.

60 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Amir Ali Saleh Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amir Ali Saleh Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In arguing that admitting the recording in evidence was plainly erroneous, review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
State of Minnesota v. Shelby Ivan Charles Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Shelby Ivan Charles Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In determining whether potentially prejudicial, but inadvertent, testimony deprived a defendant of the right to a fair trial, we consider: “the nature and source of the prejudicial matter, the number of jurors exposed to the influence, the weight of evidence properly before the jury, and the likelihood that curative measures were effective in reducing the prejudice.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).
State v. Robinson 718 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 2006
State v. Robinson 718 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 2006
concerning the statement, and the statement is * * * one of identification of a person *408 made after perceiving the person, if the court is satisfied that the circumstances of the prior identification demonstrate the reliability of the prior identification.” The issue here is over the definition of “prior identification.” -14 (Minn.App.2001), and held that Rule 801(d)(1)(C) is not limited to police lineups, showups, or other similar procedures, but extends to any statement identifying an offen
State v. Robinson 699 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Robinson 699 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001), is similar factually.
State v. McNeil 658 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. McNeil 658 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. May 29, 2001).