Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minnesotans for Responsible Recreation v. Department of Natural Resources, 632 N.W.2d 534.

76 citing documents.

Mary Jo Delaney v. Cragun Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Preeti Kaur Rajpal v. Regents of the University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Greg Peterson, Souphanny Dean, Co-Appellant, Brian Rogge v. City of Richfield, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Banking, (citation and quotation omitted).
Charles Pearson v. Rohn Industries, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Banking, Dietrich v. Canadian Pac.
Robert L. Eggerichs v. The Auto Club Services, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Banking, n.4 (Minn. 2001).
James F. Christie v. Estate of Dilman Christie, Charles Christie Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Banking, n.9 (Minn. 2001)).
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Banking, n.9 (Minn. 2001).
Scott R. McKee, M. D. v. St. Paul Eye Clinic, P. A. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Martin L. McDonal v. SuperValu, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Banking, d 534, 542 (Minn. 2001).
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Hansen v. Robert Half International, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 906 Minn. 2012
Hansen v. Robert Half International, Inc. 796 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Bahr v. CAPELLA UNIVERSITY 788 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 2010
Under the MHRA, to establish a prima facie case for a reprisal claim, a plaintiff, such as Bahr, must establish the following elements: “(1) statutorily-protected conduct by the employee; (2) adverse employment action by the employer; and (3) a causal connection between the two.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Sampair v. Village of Birchwood 784 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 2010
Private Mortgage Banking, , 541 n. 4 (Minn.2001); Augustine v. Arizant, Inc., (reaffirming the rule articulated in Hoover).
Edwards v. HOPKINS PLAZA LTD. PARTNERSHIP 783 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“We consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” , 542 (Minn.2001).
Taylor v. LSI CORP. OF AMERICA 781 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Banking, (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 , 93 S.Ct.
Friend v. Gopher Co., Inc. 771 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(explaining that MHRA plaintiff may proceed using direct evidence or McDonnell Douglas framework); cf. Sigurdson, d at 720 (stating that prima facie case may be satisfied through direct evidence).
Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corp. 766 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 2009
Banking, , 545 n. 9 (Minn.2001) (noting that “standards for granting summary judgment and for granting judgment as a matter of law are the same”).
Augustine v. Arizant Inc. 751 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 2008
We do not retreat from our prior statement that “affidavits that contradict earlier deposition testimony generally may not be used to create a genuine issue of fact,” , 541 n. 4 (Minn.2001), but those are not the facts of this case.
Gagliardi v. Ortho-Midwest, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Meads v. Best Oil Co. 725 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
(citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 , 93 S.Ct.
Wenigar v. Johnson 712 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Gee v. Minnesota State Colleges & Universities 700 N.W.2d 548 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct.
Griese v. Kamp 666 N.W.2d 404 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Gradjelick v. Hance 646 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 2002
Goins v. West Group 635 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 2001
In the context of a discriminatory discharge claim, to establish a prima facie case as that term is used in McDonnell Douglas, a plaintiff typically must demonstrate that she “ ‘(1) is a member of [a] protected class; (2) was qualified for the position from which she was discharged; and (3) was replaced by a non-member of the protected class.’ ” , 542 (Minn.2001) (quoting Feges, d at 711 ).