Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Child of Simon, 662 N.W.2d 155.

56 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. S. and P. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. S. and P. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A district court has broad discretion when determining whether to admit or exclude evidence in a juvenile-protection proceeding, and “[a] new trial will be granted because of an improper evidentiary ruling only if the complaining party demonstrates prejudicial error.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. S. H. and X. L. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. S. H. and X. L. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that a parent’s “failure to satisfy key elements of the court-ordered case plan provides ample evidence of [the parent’s] lack of compliance with the duties and responsibilities of the parent-child relationship”); (Min
In re the Welfare of the Children of K.S.F. 823 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Children of K.S.F. 823 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2012