Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Estate of Eriksen, 337 N.W.2d 671.

59 citing documents.

Ferguson v. Shea 374 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In order to find a constructive trust, a court must be “persuaded by clear and convincing evidence that the imposition of a constructive trust is justified to prevent unjust enrichment.”
Tourville v. Kowarsch 365 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Tourville v. Kowarsch 365 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Appellant also cites in support of his argument that this court should impose a constructive trust against the real estate to prevent unjust enrichment by respondent.
Mjolsness v. Mjolsness 363 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Mjolsness v. Mjolsness 363 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“The court must only be persuaded by clear and convincing evidence that the imposition of a constructive trust is justified to prevent unjust enrichment.” (citing Knox v. Knox 222 Minn. 477, 481 , ).
Rock v. Hennepin Broadcasting Associates, Inc. 359 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Rock v. Hennepin Broadcasting Associates, Inc. 359 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
There must be “clear and convincing evidence that the imposition * * * is justified to prevent unjust enrichment.” (citing Knox v. Knox, 222 Minn. 477, 481 , ).
Hollom v. Carey 343 N.W.2d 701 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hollom v. Carey 343 N.W.2d 701 Minn. Ct. App. 1984