Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hollerich v. City of Good Thunder, 340 N.W.2d 665.

27 citing documents.

Clark v. Peterson 741 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Clark v. Peterson 741 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“The concern of the Civil Damages Act is intoxication which results in injury to the intoxicated person’s dependants or others.”
Urban Ex Rel. Urban v. American Legion Post 184 695 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
K.R. v. Sanford 605 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 2000
K.R. v. Sanford 605 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 2000
Line Construction Benefit Fund (Lineco) v. Skeates 563 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Line Construction Benefit Fund (Lineco) v. Skeates 563 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(quoting Skaja v. Andrews Hotel Co., 281 Minn. 417, 423 , ).
Englund v. MN CA Partners/MN Joint Ventures 555 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Englund v. MN CA Partners/MN Joint Ventures 555 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Rambaum, d at 22 (nonmembers or guests of club); (after-hours); Kvanli v. Village of Watson, 272 Minn. 481, 484 , (minors); Strand v. Village of Watson, 245 Minn. 414, 419-20 , d *331 609, 614 (1955) (intoxicated persons); Fest v. Olson, 138 Minn. 31, 33 , 163 N.W.
Weber v. Au 512 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Weber v. Au 512 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
A civil liability act claimant must also, however, “es *350 tablish that the illegal sale contributed to the intoxication [and] that the intoxication contributed to cause the injury.” cited in Kryzer v. Champlin Am.
Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600 494 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1992
Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600 494 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1992
and Peterson v. Fulton, 192 Minn. 360, 365 , 256 N.W.
Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600 481 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600 481 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Rambaum v. Swisher 435 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1989
Rambaum v. Swisher 435 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1989
Kvanli v. Village of Watson, 272 Minn. 481, 484
Rambaum v. Swisher 423 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Rambaum v. Swisher 423 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Before 1983, the supreme court applied the Dramshop Act (or Civil Damages Act) almost mechanically, holding sales in violation of liquor laws to be illegal under the Act.
Hastings v. United Pacific Insurance Co. 396 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hastings v. United Pacific Insurance Co. 396 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hoffman v. Wiltscheck 379 N.W.2d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hoffman v. Wiltscheck 379 N.W.2d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson v. Kotval 369 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson v. Kotval 369 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Holmquist v. Miller 352 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Holmquist v. Miller 352 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1984