Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Trott, 338 N.W.2d 248.
- State v. Danh 500 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Danh 500 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Barnes v. State 489 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Barnes v. State 489 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Weisberg 473 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State v. Weisberg 473 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State v. Kaiser 469 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1991
- State v. Kaiser 469 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1991
- Brown v. State 449 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1989
- Brown v. State 449 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1989
- Saliterman v. State 443 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Saliterman v. State 443 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- State v. Saliterman 431 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
State v. Saliterman
431 N.W.2d 590
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See (appeal heard from order denying motion to withdraw a guilty plea, made after sentencing).
- Lundin v. State 430 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Lundin v. State 430 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. DeZeler 427 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1988
- State v. DeZeler 427 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1988
- State v. DeZeler 422 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
State v. DeZeler
422 N.W.2d 32
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
“There are three basic prerequisites to a valid guilty plea: the plea must be accurate, voluntary and intelligent (i.e. knowingly and understandingly made).”
- State v. Haynes 423 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Haynes 423 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Warren 419 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1988
-
State v. Warren
419 N.W.2d 795
Minn. 1988
The purpose of the factual basis requirement of Rule 15.02 is to ensure the guilty plea is “accurate, voluntary and intelligent (i.e., knowingly and understand *798 ably made).” see State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , Beaman v. State, 301 Minn. 180
- State v. Kunshier 410 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Kunshier 410 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Hernandez v. State 408 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Hernandez v. State 408 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Brant 407 N.W.2d 696 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State v. Brant
407 N.W.2d 696
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
1463, 1468 , 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970); Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13
- State v. Ferraro 403 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Ferraro 403 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Cates 384 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Cates 384 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Kennedy v. State 372 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Kennedy v. State 372 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Spann v. State 368 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Spann v. State 368 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Chapman 362 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Chapman 362 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Andren 358 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Andren 358 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Noreen 354 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Noreen 354 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Doughman v. State 351 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Doughman v. State 351 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1984