Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Estate of Lehmann by Lehmann v. Metzger, 355 N.W.2d 425.
-
Renee Dianne Florek, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Estate of Lehmann v. Metzger , (“In construing the ‘intentional act ’ exclusion of liability insuran ce policies where the underlying claim is that the insured intentionally sexually assaulted the victim, an intention to inflict injury will be inferred as a matter of law.”); see also Auto-Owners Ins.
- B.M.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 664 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2003
- B.M.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 664 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2003
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Todd 547 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1996
-
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Todd
547 N.W.2d 696
Minn. 1996
No. 656, (inferring intent as a matter of law where a female student in tenth grade was sexually assaulted by a basketball coach); (sexual assault on underage victim ipso facto intentional conduct because one cannot negligently sexually assault another).
- Rw v. Tf 528 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1995
- R.W. v. T.F. 528 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1995
-
Rw v. Tf
528 N.W.2d 869
Minn. 1995
(Sexual assault on an underage victim was ipso facto intentional conduct because one cannot negligently assault another).
-
R.W. v. T.F.
528 N.W.2d 869
Minn. 1995
we reiterated that “claims of nonconsensual sexual assault and battery invoke the intentional injury exclusion as a matter of law.” (Sexual assault on an underage victim was ipso facto intentional conduct because one cannot negligently assault another).
- Rw v. Tf 510 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Rw v. Tf
510 N.W.2d 231
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(infer intent when uncle repeatedly sexually assaults niece); State Farm Fire & Cas.
- R.W. v. T.F. 510 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
R.W. v. T.F.
510 N.W.2d 231
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(infer intent when uncle repeatedly sexually assaults niece); State Farm Fire & Cas.
- SARA L. v. Broden 507 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- SARA L. v. Broden 507 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- D.W.H. Ex Rel. Mitchell v. Steele 494 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
D.W.H. Ex Rel. Mitchell v. Steele
494 N.W.2d 513
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(claim that uncle sexually abused his niece not covered by homeowner’s policy); Fireman’s Fund Ins.
- Houg v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 481 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Houg v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
481 N.W.2d 393
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(sexual abuse of minor by relative); State Farm Fire & Cas.
- North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. R.W. 431 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. R.W. 431 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Judith G. 379 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Judith G.
379 N.W.2d 638
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
an uncle committed repeated acts of sexual assault on a minor niece.
- Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Puhl 354 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Puhl
354 N.W.2d 900
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co. v. Independent School District No. 656, State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Wil- *902 Hams, , _ (Minn.1984); the supreme court held that an intent to commit bodily injury can be inferred as a matter of law from an act of nonconsensual sexual contact.