Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc., 355 N.W.2d 138.

42 citing documents.

Dametria White, et al., as co-trustees for the next-of-kin of Helayne Bass, deceased, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
676 (Minn. 1883); and then citing Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich, & Whiteman, Inc., d 138, 141 (Minn. 1984)).
Natalie Synhaivsky, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
operates as an adjudication on the merits,” Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc., (quotation omitted) , it is only appropriate when a district court determines that (1) “the delay prejudiced the defendant” and (2) “the delay was unreasonable and inexcusable,” Modrow v. JP Foodservice, Inc., 5 ( (Min
Carl Green dba Signature Capital, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Modrow v. JP Foodservice, Inc., (citing Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc., ).
Richard R. Ryan, Trustee for the Next-of-Kin of Debra Lynn Ryan, Decedent for Action for Death by Wrongful … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
And a “spouse’s cause of action for loss of consortium does not abate upon the death of his/her mate.” Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc.
Rebecca J. Adams, John Crudele v. James Koch, Steve Hyland, Erik Ostigaard, Greg Bohnsack Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rebecca J. Adams, John Crudele v. James Koch, Steve Hyland, Erik Ostigaard, Greg Bohnsack Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc., d 138, 144 (Minn. 1984).
In the Matter of the Conservatorship of: Catherine C. Chapman, Protected Person. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Conservatorship of: Catherine C. Chapman, Protected Person. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Paul, (citing Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc., ), review denied (Minn. Jan.
Lamere v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. 827 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Lamere v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. 827 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
which stated in dicta that a wrongful-death suit must be brought within the statutory period following the date of the injury, not the date of defendant’s tortious act.
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
The provisions calling for judicial discretion in the postcon-viction statute are distinguishable from our wrongful death statute, which this court has repeatedly recognized demands a “high standard of strict compliance.” Ortiz, d at 122 ; see also Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc., (“Because the right to maintain an action for wrongful death is created by statute and is in derogation of the common law, the requirements of the statute have generally been strictly construed
Whitener Ex Rel. Miller v. Dahl 625 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 2001
Whitener Ex Rel. Miller v. Dahl 625 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 2001
The court of appeals acknowledged that the Civil Damages Act is a statutory creation in derogation of the common law and therefore must be strictly construed, citing Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich and Whiteman, Inc., -89 (Minn.1996).
Whitener v. Dahl 612 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Whitener v. Dahl 612 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
at 44 , d at 897 ; Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc.
Ortiz Ex Rel. Ortiz v. Gavenda 590 N.W.2d 119 Minn. 1999
Ortiz v. Gavenda 574 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Ortiz v. Gavenda 574 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich and Whiteman, Inc., (prerequisites to bringing wrongful death action are generally strictly construed, but remedial provisions should be liberally construed); Shumway v. Nelson, 259 Minn. 319, 322 , (wrongful death statute “is remedial in character and thus requires a liberal construction.”); F
Chahla v. City of St. Paul 507 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Chahla v. City of St. Paul 507 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc.
State v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 434 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 434 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
“Use of the Rule 41.02(1) is infrequent and is within the sound discretion of the trial court.” Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich and Whiteman, Inc.
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. 420 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1988
Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. 420 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1988
Prosser, § 127 at 902; Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simick and Whiteman, Inc.
Wherley v. Foss 416 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wherley v. Foss 416 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
“Use of Rule 41.02(1) is infrequent and is within the sound discretion of the trial court.” Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich and Whiteman, Inc.
Nachtsheim v. Wartnick 411 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nachtsheim v. Wartnick 411 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich and Whiteman, Inc.
Ed H. Anderson Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 411 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ed H. Anderson Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 411 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich and Whiteman, Inc.
Halter v. UNI. OF MINN. BD. OF REGENTS 410 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Halter v. UNI. OF MINN. BD. OF REGENTS 410 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc.
Schulz v. Milam 410 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Regie De L'Assurance Automobile Du Quebec v. Jensen 399 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1987
Regie De L'Assurance Automobile Du Quebec v. Jensen 399 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1987
In allowing the amendment and holding it would “relate back,” the trial court relied upon Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter and Simich, & Whiteman, Inc.
Belton v. City of Minneapolis 393 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Belton v. City of Minneapolis 393 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“Use of Rule 41.02(1) is infrequent and is within the sound discretion of the trial court.” Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich and Whiteman, Inc.
Copeland v. Bragge 378 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Copeland v. Bragge 378 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc.
Dvoracek v. Lovely 366 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Dvoracek v. Lovely 366 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich and Whiteman, Inc.