Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Grein v. Grein, 364 N.W.2d 383.

101 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Nicholas John Kaminski v. Tammy Marie Hackett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas John Kaminski v. Tammy Marie Hackett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Melissa Dawn Paisley v. Clark Davis Kratzer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Melissa Dawn Paisley v. Clark Davis Kratzer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(refusing to remand in a child-custody case when “from reading the files, 8 the record, and the court’s findings, on remand the [district] court would undoubtedly make findings that comport with the statutory language” and reach the same result); Ta
In re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp v. Christina Ann Burton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp v. Christina Ann Burton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
12 “Denial of access to a parent and efforts to paint a parent in a poor light have the potential to endanger a child’s emotional health or impair his emotional development.” (-86 (Minn. 1985)); (“[T]he child was harmed by being denied visitation with his father for six months.”); -16 (Minn. App. 1985) (holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by ordering supervised v
Mark Michael Dwyer v. Tamara Jo Molde Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mark Michael Dwyer v. Tamara Jo Molde Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(refusing to remand a custody dispute for missing findings of fact when doing so would not alter the result).
In re the Marriage of: Diane Drays Hill v. Michael C. Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Diane Drays Hill v. Michael C. Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
P. 61 (requiring harmless error to be ignored); (declining to remand and affirming the district court in a child-custody case when “from reading the files, the record, and the court’s findings, on remand the [district] court would undoubtedly make findings that comport with the statutory language” and reach the same result).
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend 869 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend 869 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 383, 385–86 (Minn. 1985) (affirming custody modification, stating that “[w]ithout doubt, 16 .
In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel Goemaat Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel Goemaat Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(refusing to remand when the record made clear that the district court would comport with the statutory language in further proceedings).
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Curtis v. Christopher John Hanna Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Curtis v. Christopher John Hanna Minn. Ct. App. 2015
P. 61 (requiring harmless error is to be ignored); (declining to remand for additional findings because it was clear the district court would arrive at the same decision).
In re the Marriage of: James Donald Knight v. Maria Pieternella Knight Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: James Donald Knight v. Maria Pieternella Knight Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(declining to remand and affirming the district court when the district court would undoubtedly reach the same result on remand); (refusing to remand for technical, de minimis financial error).
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(declining to remand and affirming the district court when, “from reading the files, the record, and the court’s findings, on remand the [district] court would undoubtedly make findings that comport with the statutory language” and reach the same result).
In re the Marriage of: Paul Timothy Patock v. Cathy Liane Patock n/k/a Cathy Liane Mehr, County of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Paul Timothy Patock v. Cathy Liane Patock n/k/a Cathy Liane Mehr, County of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(declining to remand and affirming when, “from reading the files, the record, and the court’s findings, on remand the [district] court would undoubtedly make findings that comport with the statutory language” and reach the same result); n.1 (Minn. App. 2005
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(affirming a custody decision despite a lack of statutorily “mandated” findings when the file showed that, on remand, the district court “would undoubtedly make findings that comport with the statut[e]” and reach the same result); n.1 (Minn. App. 2005) (cit
Marriage of Tarlan v. Sorensen 702 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Marriage of Tarlan v. Sorensen 702 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(declining to remand and affirming the district court in a child-custody case when "from reading the files, the record, and the court’s findings, on remand the [district] court would undoubtedly make findings that comport with the statutory language” and reach the same result).
In Re Estate of Martignacco 689 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Estate of Martignacco 689 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
P. 61 (requiring harmless error to be ignored); (declining to remand and affirming the district court in a child-custody case where “from reading the files, the record, and the court’s findings, on remand the [district] court would undoubtedly make findings that comport with the statutory language” and reach the same result).
Sharp v. Bilbro 614 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Sharp v. Bilbro 614 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
see Minn. Stat. § 518.175 , subd.
Dabill v. Dabill 514 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Dabill v. Dabill 514 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Rogge v. Rogge 509 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rogge v. Rogge 509 N.W.2d 163 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(remand would not further the legislative purpose of section 518.18 where it seems clear from the record that on remand the trial court would make findings comporting with the statutory language).
Spaeth v. Warren 478 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Keith v. Keith 429 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Keith v. Keith 429 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Pflug v. Kennedy 401 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Pflug v. Kennedy 401 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Clark v. Bullard 396 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Greenlaw v. Greenlaw 396 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Greenlaw v. Greenlaw 396 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Clark v. Bullard 396 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.W. 391 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.W. 391 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1986
§ 260.221(b)(7)); (modification of custody); (visitation rights); (removing child from state); (voluntary termination of parental rights); State ex.
Marriage of Chafin v. Rude 391 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Chafin v. Rude 391 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 390 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 390 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1986
See, (marital dissolution custody determinations); (modification of child custody award); (visitation rights); (custodial parent removing child from state); State ex rel.
Meier v. Connelly 378 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 1985