Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Boulevard Del, Inc. v. Stillman, 343 N.W.2d 50.

40 citing documents.

Reliant Loan Servicing, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Body & Trailer, Inc., (d 50, 52 (Minn. App. 1984)).
Hanson v. Woolston 701 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Hanson v. Woolston 701 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Sharecom, Inc. v. LDB Int’l Corp., (stating that district court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to set aside satisfied judgment, even if judgment fraudulently procured); Boulevard Del, (reasoning that “judgment which is paid and satisfied of record ceases to have any existence, leaving nothing to ‘vacate’ ”).
Herubin v. Finn 603 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Herubin v. Finn 603 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Once a satisfaction of judgment is filed with the district court, that judgment “ceases to have any existence.” Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc., (quoting Boulevard Del, ).
Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Minnesota School Board Ass'n 600 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Minnesota School Board Ass'n 600 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Sutton v. Hansen 562 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Sutton v. Hansen 562 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
d at 918 ; see Boulevard Del, (“[A] judgment which is paid and satisfied of record ceases to have any existence.”).
Carter v. Anderson 554 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Carter v. Anderson 554 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
American Sharecom, Inc. v. LDB International Corp. 553 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
American Sharecom, Inc. v. LDB International Corp. 553 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc., Boulevard Del
Heideman v. Northwestern National Life Insurance Co. 546 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Heideman v. Northwestern National Life Insurance Co. 546 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc. 482 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1992
Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc. 482 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1992
The court of appeals properly stated the general rule applicable to civil actions in Boulevard Del
Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc. 464 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
City of Duluth, St. Louis County v. P.F.L., Inc. 431 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
City of Duluth, St. Louis County v. P.F.L., Inc. 431 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Boulevard Del, -53 (Minn.Ct.App.1984) (attorney’s affidavit stating what the attorney believes will be disregarded.).
Reardon Office Equipment v. Nelson 409 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Reardon Office Equipment v. Nelson 409 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of Faribault v. One 1976 Buick LeSabre, Serial No. 4P39J6X159337 408 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of Faribault v. One 1976 Buick LeSabre, Serial No. 4P39J6X159337 408 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Jorissen v. Miller 399 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1987
Jorissen v. Miller 399 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 1987
Appellants rely on the appellate court case of Boulevard Del, wherein the lower court stated: “Therefore, we hold that a judgment which is paid and satisfied of record ceases to have any existence leaving nothing to ‘vacate.’ ” Id.
Nash v. Allen 392 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nash v. Allen 392 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Co., 280 Minn. 482, 487 , (affidavit by a person who may not properly testify at trial will have no effect); Boulevard Del, -53 (Minn.Ct.App.
Jorissen v. Miller 386 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Jorissen v. Miller 386 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Appellants also contend that the conciliation court judgment could not be vacated because it was already satisfied, relying exclusively on Boulevard Del
Chaney v. Lieberman 386 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Chaney v. Lieberman 386 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Respondent asserts that Boulevard Del, applies here.
Gunderson v. Lake County Board of Health 389 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gunderson v. Lake County Board of Health 389 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
It relies in great part on Boulevard Del
Pelletier Corp. v. Chas. M. Freidheim Co. 383 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pelletier Corp. v. Chas. M. Freidheim Co. 383 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
This case is unlike Boulevard Del, where the party made no effort to depose those who had personal knowledge of facts that could defeat a summary judgment motion.
Kessel v. Kessel 370 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kessel v. Kessel 370 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. $14,000 Dollars in Various Denominations of United States Currency 345 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. $14,000 Dollars in Various Denominations of United States Currency 345 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1984