Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State, City of Falcon Heights v. Pazderski, 352 N.W.2d 85.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In State, City of Falcon Heights v. Pazderski, law enforcement found the appellant “asleep in his car on the property in which he lived.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- Deron Eron Puro v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Deron Eron Puro v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Antone William Guimont v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Antone William Guimont v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State v. Fleck 777 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 2010
-
State v. Fleck
777 N.W.2d 233
Minn. 2010
Fleck appealed his convictions and, argued that the evidence was legally insufficient to convict him of being in physical control of a motor vehicle when he was sleeping in his vehicle, which was parked in an assigned residential parking spot with the driver’s door open, keys in the center console, no devices of the vehicle in operation
- State v. Fleck 763 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-
State v. Fleck
763 N.W.2d 39
Minn. Ct. App. 2009
ANALYSIS Fleck, relying on State, argues that evidence that he was merely sleeping in his car at his residence while intoxicated is insufficient to support a finding that he was in physical control of the vehicle within the meaning of Minn.Stat.
- Snyder v. Commissioner of Public Safety 744 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- Snyder v. Commissioner of Public Safety 744 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- State v. Starfield 481 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Starfield
481 N.W.2d 834
Minn. 1992
the defendant was found asleep in the front seat of his car parked in his driveway.
- State v. Starfield 472 N.W.2d 143 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
State v. Starfield
472 N.W.2d 143
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
11, 1985) (appellant sleeping off intoxication in car with keys on dash but with engine inoperable was not in physical control of the car); (appellant who was under the influence of alcohol but who was home and only returned to his car to sleep therein because of domestic discord was not in violation of Minn.Stat.
- Short v. Commissioner of Public Safety 422 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Distinguished Short v. Commissioner of Public Safety 422 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- In Re Kaldahl 418 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
In Re Kaldahl
418 N.W.2d 532
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
“[T]he standard of proof in misdemeanor cases is proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”
- Sens v. Commissioner of Public Safety 399 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Distinguished
Sens v. Commissioner of Public Safety
399 N.W.2d 602
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
where the sleeping occupant of a vehicle was not short of his intended destination, but was in his own driveway.
- Ledin v. Commissioner of Public Safety 393 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Butterfield v. Commissioner of Public Safety 393 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Butterfield v. Commissioner of Public Safety 393 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Ledin v. Commissioner of Public Safety 393 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Bale v. Commissioner of Public Safety 385 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Bale v. Commissioner of Public Safety 385 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Maletich 384 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Maletich 384 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Ives v. Commissioner of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Ives v. Commissioner of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Roberts v. Commissioner of Public Safety 371 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Roberts v. Commissioner of Public Safety 371 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Mariner 366 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Mariner
366 N.W.2d 376
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The evidence is sufficient to establish that Mariner was in physical control of the vehicle, and was under the influence, see State v. Hicks, 301 Minn. 350
- Palme v. Commissioner of Public Safety 366 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Palme v. Commissioner of Public Safety 366 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Walek v. Commissioner of Public Safety 361 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Walek v. Commissioner of Public Safety
361 N.W.2d 482
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
held the evidence insufficient to uphold a criminal DWI conviction.
- Kozak v. Commissioner of Public Safety 359 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Kozak v. Commissioner of Public Safety
359 N.W.2d 625
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“Physical control” a DWI case.
- State v. Prior 356 N.W.2d 754 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Prior 356 N.W.2d 754 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Berns v. Commissioner of Public Safety 355 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Berns v. Commissioner of Public Safety
355 N.W.2d 493
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See, e.g., Id.; (Minn.Ct.App.
- Dufrane v. Commissioner of Public Safety 353 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Dufrane v. Commissioner of Public Safety
353 N.W.2d 705
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Pazder *708 ski