DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Wiley, 366 N.W.2d 265.

260 citing documents.

  • State v. Zanter 535 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Zanter 535 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1995
    (citing Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Richardson 514 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Richardson 514 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    This determination should be made under the “totality of the circumstances test.” (citing Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Williams 510 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Williams 510 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    (other persons residing in house had access to bedroom in which marijuana was found).
  • Commissioner v. Fort 479 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1992
  • Commissioner v. Fort 479 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1992
    See, State v. Wiley, 295 Minn. 411, 422 , -76 (1973); State v. LaBarre, 292 Minn. 228, 237
  • State v. Kessler 470 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Kessler 470 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Albrecht 465 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Albrecht 465 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. McCloskey 453 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1990
  • State v. McCloskey 453 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1990
    33 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1453 (1983)
  • State v. McCloskey 451 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. McCloskey 451 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    § 626.08 (1986) provides “[a] search warrant cannot be issued but upon probable cause, supported by affidavit.” Probable cause to search is determined by the “totality of the circumstances.” (citing Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bonynge 450 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Bonynge 450 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    Considering the totality of the circumstances, the magistrate should make a practical, common sense decision whether “there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lieder 449 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Lieder 449 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Reese 446 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Reese 446 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Anderson 439 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Anderson 439 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Dyer 438 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Dyer 438 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    D. Probable Cause to Issue In deciding whether to issue a warrant, the magistrate makes “a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit * * * there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Moore 438 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Moore 438 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1989
    2317, 2330 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983) (dicta); 1 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 3.4(a) (2 ed.1986), we need not decide if there was a material misrepresentation made in this case.
  • Arbitration Between Minnesota State Patrol Troopers Ass'n Ex Rel. Pince v. State, Department of Public Safety 437 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1989
    (corroboration on a non-key item and informant had history of past reliability).
  • State v. Wessels 424 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Wessels 424 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    (quoting State v. Florine, 303 Minn. 103, 105 , ).
  • State v. Ailport 412 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Ailport 412 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    (quoting Gates, 462 U.S. at 238 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Marshall 411 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Marshall 411 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Gabbert 411 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Velishek 410 N.W.2d 893 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Gabbert 411 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Porter 411 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Porter 411 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); aff'd
  • State v. Valento 405 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Valento 405 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Krech 399 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Krech 399 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Herbst 395 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Herbst 395 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Balsimo 389 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Balsimo 389 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1986