DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Heidelberger, 353 N.W.2d 582.

27 citing documents.

  • State v. Danowit 497 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Danowit 497 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    (if defendant has forfeited right to raise issue on appeal by *639 failing to object at trial, reviewing court will only order new trial to prevent conviction of innocent person), pet.
  • Schmitz v. Stransky 454 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • Schmitz v. Stransky 454 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    Prior crimes evidence permits the jury to see the “whole person.” pet.
  • State v. Skramstad 433 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Skramstad 433 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Case 412 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Case 412 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Schwab 409 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Whiteside 400 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Whiteside 400 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    l conduct admissible when the offense charged was first-degree criminal sexual conduct); Bettin, (prior conviction for rape admissible when offense charged was third-degree criminal sexual conduct); Brouillette, (prior conviction for third-degree criminal sexual conduct admissible when offense charged was fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct); pet.
  • State v. Smith 380 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Smith 380 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Banks 379 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Banks 379 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Fisler 374 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Fisler 374 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Best 370 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Best 370 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Spencer 366 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Spencer 366 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Even though he failed to object at trial, Spencer argues the court should grant him a new trial because failure to do so would “perpetuate a substantial injustice in the sense that an innocent person may have been convicted.”
  • State v. Williams 363 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Williams 363 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Givens 356 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Givens 356 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    -08 (Minn.1979); -38 (Minn.1978)
  • State v. Fischer 354 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Fischer 354 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    A at 588-591 (Minn.Ct.App.1984); it is clear that the instant case similarly is lacking in error on this ground.