Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Patricelli, 357 N.W.2d 89.
-
State of Minnesota, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(granting jail credit for time in custody in Minnesota on unrelated charges) , (noting that defendant is not entitled to jail credit for time in custody in North 6 Dakota on non-Minnesota charges).
- Otha Eric Townsend v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2024
-
Otha Eric Townsend v. State of Minnesota
Minn. 2024
Guidelines III.C (1992); d 89, 94 (Minn. 1984).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 89, 94 (Minn. 1984) (stating that “if [the] defendant’s sentences were consecutive,” then “crediting the defendant for jail time against both sentences would give him an unfair 6 double credit”).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- State v. Roy 928 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2019
-
Jonathon Duane Taylor Hanson, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
because to do otherwise would constitute ‘double credit.’” ().
- Lovell N. Oates, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Townsend v. State 834 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 2013
- Townsend v. State 834 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 2013
- State v. Clarkin 817 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 2012
-
State v. Clarkin
817 N.W.2d 678
Minn. 2012
(holding that defendant was entitled to the credit requested because the two sentences imposed were concurrent, and in the case of concurrent sentences the defendant should be “able to apply the jail time against both of them” ()).
- State v. Ortega 798 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 2011
-
State v. Ortega
798 N.W.2d 59
Minn. 2011
Furthermore, we have recognized that "the police must also be al *73 lowed to encourage suspects to talk where the suspect has not clearly refused.”
- State v. Bailey 677 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 2004
- State v. Cameron 603 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
State v. Cameron
603 N.W.2d 847
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
According to State v. Patricelli jail credit applies to each sentence of multiple concurrent terms.
- State v. Ritt 599 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1999
- State v. Ritt 599 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1999
- State v. Champion 517 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Champion 517 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Elting 480 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Elting 480 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Bonafide 457 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Bonafide 457 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Akbar 419 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Akbar 419 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Doherty 419 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Doherty 419 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- State v. Klindt 400 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Klindt 400 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Torell 396 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Torell 396 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Holmes v. State 394 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Holmes v. State 394 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State ex rel. Linehan v. Wood 394 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State ex rel. Linehan v. Wood
394 N.W.2d 152
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Dulski, d at 309 ; -94 (Minn.1984).
- State v. Anderson 388 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Anderson
388 N.W.2d 798
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the defendant spent time in Chisago County jail before being arraigned on a charge in Washington County.
- State v. Bauman 388 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Bauman 388 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Blegen 387 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Blegen
387 N.W.2d 459
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
1 (defendant jailed in Chisago County was given credit against sentence imposed in Washington County for time served while Washington County placed “hold” on him).
- State v. Doyle 386 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Doyle 386 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Effinger v. State 380 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1986
-
Effinger v. State
380 N.W.2d 483
Minn. 1986
This court has noted, however, that, in situations of consecutive sentences, the jail credit should be applied to only the first sentence since to do otherwise would constitute “double credit.”
- State v. Anderson 378 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Anderson 378 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Willis 376 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1985