Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Summit Court, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co., 354 N.W.2d 13.

38 citing documents.

Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company v. Historic Ivy Tower, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company v. Historic Ivy Tower, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
ion or reference to generally recognized standards such as market value and not where the amount of damages depended upon contingencies or upon jury discretion (as in actions for personal injury or injury to reputation).” (quoting Summit Court, (other quotation omitted)), review dismissed (Minn. Oct.
Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc. 681 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc. 681 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See Summit Court, , 16 n. 1 (Minn.1984).
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 661 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 661 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
We hold that the district court permissibly declined to award prejudgment interest on the judgment because the owners’ damages were not “readily ascertainable by computation.” See Summit Court, (stating that plaintiff is entitled to prejudgment interest “where the damages were readily ascertainable by computation or reference to generally recognized standards such as market value”).
Rice Lake Contracting Corp. v. Rust Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 616 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Rice Lake Contracting Corp. v. Rust Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 616 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
See Summit Court, Inc. v. Northern States Power, Co., (after party executes release and satisfaction of judgment, that party may not later claim prejudgment interest).
Pine Valley Meats, Inc. v. Canal Capital Corp. 566 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Pine Valley Meats, Inc. v. Canal Capital Corp. 566 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Cf. Summit Court, (prejudgment interest appropriate where damages were based on fixed costs readily ascertainable prior to trial and required little jury discretion in ascertaining final award).
Skifstrom v. City of Coon Rapids 524 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Skifstrom v. City of Coon Rapids 524 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
al judgment where the damages claim [was] liquidated, or, if un-liquidated, “where the damages were readily ascertainable by computation or reference to generally recognized standards such as market value and not where the amount of damages depended upon contingencies or upon jury discretion (as in actions for personal injury or injury to reputation).” Summit Court, (quoting Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , ).
Dear v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'n 481 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Dear v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'n 481 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Summit Court, see Donaldson, d at 537 (interest awarded where surviving spouse received accumulated benefits); Ryan, 251 Minn. at 254 , d at 21 (interest was awarded when police officer received accumulated benefits); Seeway Port Auth.
Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Prior to 1984, an award of prejudgment interest was only allowed where the “damages were readily ascertainable by computation or reference to generally recognized standards such as market value.” See Summit Court
Higgins v. J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Higgins v. J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Summit Court, (quoting Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , ); Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc.
Hogs Unlimited v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 401 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1987
Hogs Unlimited v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 401 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1987
Solid Gold Realty, Inc. v. Mondry 399 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Solid Gold Realty, Inc. v. Mondry 399 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mondry premises this argument on Summit Court, appeal after remand
Hogs Unlimited v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 390 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hogs Unlimited v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 390 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
II A party is entitled to prejudgment interest where the claim is liquidated or, if unliquidated, “where the damages were readily ascertainable by computation or reference to generally recognized standards such as market value and not where the amount of damages depended upon contingencies or upon jury discretion.” Summit Court, (quoting Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , ).
Acton Construction Co. v. State 383 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Acton Construction Co. v. State 383 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Summit Court, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 382 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Summit Court, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 382 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Summit Court, the supreme court held that Summit Court was entitled to prejudgment interest on the loss-of-use damages.
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc. 382 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc. 382 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
inal judgment when the damages claim is liquidated or, if unliquidated, “where the damages were readily ascertainable by computation or reference to generally recognized standards such as market value and not where the amount of damages depended upon contingencies or upon jury discretion (as in actions for personal injury or injury to reputation).” Summit Court, (quoting Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , ).
L.P. Medical Specialists, Ltd. v. St. Louis County 379 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
L.P. Medical Specialists, Ltd. v. St. Louis County 379 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See also Summit Court, , 16 n. 1 (Minn.1984).
San Francisco Real Estate Investors v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of St. Paul 359 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
San Francisco Real Estate Investors v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of St. Paul 359 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
interest “where the damages claim is liquidated or, if unliquidated, ‘where the damages were readily ascertainable by computation or reference to generally recognized standards such as market value and not where the amount of damages depended upon contingencies or upon jury discretion (as in actions for personal injury or injury to reputation).’ ” Summit Court, (quoting Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , ).
Bilotta ex rel. Cutting v. Kelley Co. 358 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bilotta ex rel. Cutting v. Kelley Co. 358 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See, e.g., Summit Court, Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518