Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Back, 341 N.W.2d 273.

177 citing documents.

State v. Jones 733 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Jones 733 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Rather, the question for the district court “in deciding whether to depart durationally is whether the defendant’s conduct was significantly more or less serious than that typically involved in the commission of the crime in question.”
State v. Heden 719 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 2006
State v. Heden 719 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 2006
See Anderson, d *697 at 701 (holding that firearm possession charges cannot serve as a predicate for second-degree felony murder because possession of a firearm is not inherently dangerous); (concluding that a property offense can support a second-degree felony murder conviction if it involves special danger to human life).
State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
State v. Beaty 696 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Beaty 696 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
serious than that typically involved in the commission of the crime in question.”
State v. Mitchell 693 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Mitchell 693 N.W.2d 891 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
The supreme court subsequently interpreted the 1981 statutory amendment to mean that “the felony-murder rule can be used even when the underlying felony is a property offense if that offense, as committed, involves special danger to human life.”
State v. Bertsch 689 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bertsch 689 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bendzula 675 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bendzula 675 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
*925 (permitting consideration of sentences of co-defendants and other offenders).
Taylor v. State 670 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2003
State v. Anderson 666 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2003
State v. Anderson 666 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2003
State v. Anderson 654 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Anderson 654 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See, (shoplifting); (damage to property); (sale of narcotics); (sale of narcotics).
State v. Thao 649 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2002
State v. Thao 649 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2002
State v. Morris 609 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Morris 609 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Sanders 598 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1999
State v. Sanders 598 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1999
Smith v. State 596 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Smith v. State 596 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Minn. Stat. § 609.19 (2); (noting second-degree felony murder revised to apply to all but specific felony exceptions); 9 Henry W. McCarr, Minnesota Practice § 54.2, ' at 225-26 (2d ed.1990) ( and noting felony murder rule can be used with any underlying felony, including property offenses); see also Minn.Stat.
State v. Jackson 596 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Jackson 596 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In deciding whether the circumstances support a departure from a presumptive sentence, the trial court focuses on “whether the defendant’s conduct was significantly more or less serious than that typically involved in the commission of the crime in question.”
State v. Spain 590 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1999
State v. Spain 590 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1999
State v. Hough 585 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1998
State v. Hough 585 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1998
State v. Behl 573 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Behl 573 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
For example, -77 (Minn.1983), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Rairdon v. State 557 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1996
Rairdon v. State 557 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1996
A sentencing court should consider whether the defendant’s conduct was “significantly more or less serious than that typically involved in the commission of the crime in question.”
State v. Evenson 554 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Evenson 554 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Esler 553 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Esler 553 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
1 the trial court concluded that this factor was especially troubling because a person should be able to feel secure from outside harm when in the home.
State v. Smith 541 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1996
State v. Cole 542 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1996
State v. Smith 541 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1996
State v. Cole 542 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1996
State v. Chaklos 528 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1995
State v. Chaklos 528 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1995
State v. Bauerly 520 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Bauerly 520 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Bates 507 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1993