Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co., 370 N.W.2d 414.

33 citing documents.

Frederick S. Fish, Minn. 2019
Fish v. Ramler Trucking, Inc. 923 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Fish v. Ramler Trucking, Inc. 923 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Coons Co. , ; Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc. , ; Cambern v. Sioux Tools, Inc. , ; Johnson v. Raske Bldg.
McCarty v. City of Minneapolis 654 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
McCarty v. City of Minneapolis 654 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Drake v. Reile's Transfer & Delivery, Inc. 613 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Drake v. Reile's Transfer & Delivery, Inc. 613 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Coons Co., -19 (Minn.1985).
Decker v. Brunkow 557 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Decker v. Brunkow 557 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Coons Co., noted that “the statutory apportionment of damages, section 604.02, does not govern an employer’s contribution” because a third-party tortfeasor and an employer “are neither jointly liable nor jointly and severally liable” to the employee.
Albert v. Paper Calmenson & Co. 524 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1994
Albert v. Paper Calmenson & Co. 524 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1994
Albert v. Paper Calmenson & Co. 515 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Albert v. Paper Calmenson & Co. 515 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Coons Co., the Minnesota Supreme Court, while noting that ordinarily the Labor Department allocates the proceeds, held that the trial court should allocate the proceeds to dispose of the pending litigation.
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1993
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1993
Dornfeld v. Oberg 491 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Dornfeld v. Oberg 491 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Coons Co., (although reckless act is intentionally committed, intentional wrongdoing involves intent to harm).
Hahn v. Tri-Line Farmers Co-Op 478 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hahn v. Tri-Line Farmers Co-Op 478 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Coons Co., section 604.02 was not applied to a workers’ compensation third-party liability action because the third-party defendant and the employer were not jointly liable.
Folstad v. Eder 467 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1991
Folstad v. Eder 467 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1991
Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc. 463 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1990
Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc. 463 N.W.2d 722 Minn. 1990
Coons Co., -20 (Minn.1985).
Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 426 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1988
Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 426 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1988
Todalen v. United States Chemical Co. 424 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Todalen v. United States Chemical Co. 424 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Coons Co., argues it should be allowed to offset its contribution claim against Hormel’s subro-gation interest, and its right of contribution should be calculated by multiplying the amount of fault apportioned to the employer by the total damages awarded to the employee through a jury verdict.
Jendro v. Honeywell, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Jendro v. Honeywell, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Coons Co., -21 (Minn.1985).
Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co. 391 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co. 391 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Motor Freight System 384 N.W.2d 196 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Motor Freight System 384 N.W.2d 196 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
6 (1984), see Kempa v. E. W Coons Co.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by