Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Hill v. Hill, 356 N.W.2d 49.

20 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See, e.g., Serbus, d at 385-86 (explaining that an antenuptial agreement was procedurally fair even though it was not supported by adequate consideration); -54 (Minn. App. 1984) (same).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Section 5.F of the antenuptial agreement states that “each party waives the right to claim attorney fees and costs from the other.” In denying John’s post-trial motion on this issue, the district court cited this court’s rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Estate of Margaret Peteler Bush, a/k/a Margaret Bush Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Estate of Margaret Peteler Bush, a/k/a Margaret Bush Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Bette Lou Gubbe Slag, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
( rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
Pollock-Halvarson v. McGuire 576 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Pollock-Halvarson v. McGuire 576 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Williams v. Williams 801 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 444 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1989
54-55 (Minn.App.1984) (common law allowed antenuptial agreements to include marital property) pet.
Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 429 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 429 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
§ 519.11 found that “the provision in the agreement which purports to govern the distribution of marital property is invalid and must be severed from the rest of the agreement.” Whether antenuptial agreements may be used to distribute marital property depends on the interpretation of Minn.Stat.
Marriage of Christensen v. Christensen 393 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
53 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), pet.
Hedlund v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Co. 377 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nurmi v. Foremost Insurance Co. 376 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
for rev. granted, discussed below.
Marriage of Tucker v. Tucker 368 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Tucker v. Tucker 368 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
: * * * a presumption of fraud arises where the parties to an antenuptial agreement stand in a confidential relationship to one another and there is inadequate consideration to support their agreement.
Marriage of Alvord v. Alvord 365 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Alvord v. Alvord 365 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
this court let stand an order for temporary child support made retroactive to the date that the custodial parent first applied for relief.
Marriage of Rudbeck v. Rudbeck 365 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Englund v. Englund, 286 Minn. 227, 230 , , 53 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), pet.
Hoeschen v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. 359 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Appellant appealed the trial court’s cer t. granted