Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Kostelnik v. Kostelnik, 367 N.W.2d 665.
- Marriage of Rask v. Rask 445 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Marriage of Rask v. Rask 445 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Bolstad v. State 435 N.W.2d 547 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Bolstad v. State 435 N.W.2d 547 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Marriage of Bolitho v. Bolitho 422 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Marriage of Bolitho v. Bolitho 422 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Gale v. Howard 413 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Letsch v. Letsch 409 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Letsch v. Letsch 409 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Mitterhauser v. Mitterhauser 399 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Mitterhauser v. Mitterhauser 399 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Arndt v. American Family Insurance Co. 394 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1986
-
Arndt v. American Family Insurance Co.
394 N.W.2d 791
Minn. 1986
at 251; -70 (Minn.App.1985).
- Marriage of Currey v. Currey 393 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Currey v. Currey 393 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Nardini v. Nardini 385 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Marriage of Nardini v. Nardini
385 N.W.2d 339
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
While it would have been helpful to have the trial court’s reasoning and explanation as to why it chose the lower value, “it is within the trial court’s discretion to choose one appraisal over another, and by taking one of two proffered [valuations], the trial court cannot be said to have erred.” (Minn.Ct.