Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hildebrandt v. Whirlpool Corp., 364 N.W.2d 394.

27 citing documents.

Philip Ayeni, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
at 440; (stating that “an employer who intentionally and maliciously assaulted an employee, while engaged in employment, could be sued at common law despite the availability of workers’ compensation”).
James P. Thommes v. Honeywell International, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
James P. Thommes v. Honeywell International, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An employer’s intentional act leading to injury does not by itself trigger this exception; the employer’s intentional action must be premised on “a deliberate or malicious intent to injure.” d 394, 396 (Minn. 1985).
Meintsma v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 2004
Meintsma v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 2004
Gunderson, d at 703 ; -45 (Minn.1987); Breimhorst v. Beckman, 227 Minn. 409, 425-26
Gunderson v. Harrington 632 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2001
Gunderson v. Harrington 632 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2001
Gunderson v. Harrington 619 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Gunderson v. Harrington 619 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
McDonough v. Muska Electric Co. 486 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 1992
McDonough v. Muska Electric Co. 486 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 1992
Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc. 447 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1989
Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc. 447 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1989
Co., -27 (Minn.1987); Breimhorst , 227 Minn, at 429, d at 732 .
Konken v. Oakland Farmers' Elevator Co. 425 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Konken v. Oakland Farmers' Elevator Co. 425 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
DeVries ex rel. DeVries v. Emblom 420 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
DeVries ex rel. DeVries v. Emblom 420 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
It held that since appellant does not allege a “conscious and deliberate intent to injure” the decedent, worker’s
Bergeson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 414 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1987
Bergeson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 414 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1987
See, Minn. Stat. § 176.001 (1986).
Parker v. Tharp 409 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Parker v. Tharp 409 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Breimhorst v. Beckman, 227 Minn. 409, 426 , (holding that “such intent may not be inferred from mere negligence, though it be gross”); (worker’s compensation was exclusive remedy when employer allegedly concealed a known workplace hazard, because there was no conscious and deliberate intent to inflict injury).
Kaess v. Armstrong Cork Co. 403 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1987
Kaess v. Armstrong Cork Co. 403 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1987
Kaluza v. Home Insurance Co. 403 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1987
Kaluza v. Home Insurance Co. 403 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1987
§§ 176.-021, 176.031 (1984); see Hildebrandt v. *236 Whirlpool Corp.
Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co. 370 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1985
Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co. 370 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1985
Since punitive damages may not be assessed against an employer absent a conscious and deliberate intent to inflict injury on the employee, the jury was not asked to determine whether or not U.S. Steel’s conduct showed willful indifference to the rights or safety of others.