Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hagen, 361 N.W.2d 407.

45 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Patzold, d at 807 (rejecting claim of prosecutorial misconduct based on police officer’s “brief and unsolicited comment” because the prosecutor’s question did not call for the improper response and the prosecutor “moved on” to a different topic); (concluding, in the c ontext of a mistrial motion, that the prosecutor had not “intentionally tainted the trial by asking the question which elicited the objectionable response” because “the answer was an unintended and unexpected explanatory answer
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
But the state also cites caselaw stating that “unintended responses under unplanned circumstances ordinarily do not require a new trial.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
State v. Patzold 917 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Patzold 917 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Hagen , , 413 (Minn. App. 1985), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
But “unintended responses under unplanned circumstances ordinarily do not require a new trial.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Kelly Bruce Goggleye Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kelly Bruce Goggleye Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[U]nintended responses under unplanned circumstances ordinarily do not require a new trial.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Rodney Cap McCowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rodney Cap McCowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, e.g., Williams, d at 237 (holding that a failure to give limiting instructions on character evidence absent a request is not reversible error); (“[U]nintended responses under unplanned circumstances ordinarily do not require a new trial.”), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Marc Jonathan Knotz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Marc Jonathan Knotz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[U]nintended responses under unplanned circumstances ordinarily do not require a new trial.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Shelby Ivan Charles Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Shelby Ivan Charles Minn. Ct. App. 2014
do not require a new trial.” d 407, 413 (Minn. App. 1985), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Dontrell Dyna Flowers Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Dontrell Dyna Flowers Minn. Ct. App. 2014
But “unintended responses under unplanned circumstances ordinarily do not require a new trial.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
State v. Romine 757 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Romine 757 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
review denied (Minn. Apr.
State v. O'HAGAN 474 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. O'HAGAN 474 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(defendant held herself out as a reputable antique dealer in order to conduct a sophisticated fencing operation over an extended period of time) (), pet.
State v. Schenk 427 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Schenk 427 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Forcier 415 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Forcier 415 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Myers 416 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1987
State v. Myers 416 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1987
petition for review denied (Minn.1985), a case of arson in the second degree in which the court of appeals based its conclusion that the conduct associated with the arson was particularly serious in part on the value of the property destroyed, a $70,000 house.
State v. Hole 400 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Hole 400 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Lewis 385 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Lewis 385 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Norregaard 380 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Norregaard 380 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Fitzgerald 382 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Fitzgerald 382 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Ewald 373 N.W.2d 358 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Ewald 373 N.W.2d 358 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See State v. Pratt, 277 Minn. 363, 366-68 , -14 (1967); pet.
State v. Doughman 368 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Doughman 368 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Taylor 369 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Taylor 369 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Williams 363 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Williams 363 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Richardson 363 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Richardson 363 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Erickson 362 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Erickson 362 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1985