Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Tell v. Tell, 383 N.W.2d 678.

52 citing documents.

Leslie E. Sheehy Lee, Appellant, vs. Travis W. Kalis, Respondent, County of Le Sueur, Respondent Minn. 2025
Leslie E. Sheehy Lee, Appellant, vs. Travis W. Kalis, Respondent, County of Le Sueur, Respondent Minn. 2025
By contrast, Kalis relies on Dent and a footnote in Tell v. Tell (Tell II), to support his argument that extrajudicial agreements are valid and enforceable, if they are subsequently approved by the court.
Marriage of Kielley v. Kielley 674 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Marriage of Kielley v. Kielley 674 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
On review, the Minneso *776 ta Supreme Court referred to this assertion, stating that it was both “contrary to th[e] encouraged policy” of resolving dissolution matters by stipulation and that the statement was “subject to misinterpretation.” , 682 n. 2 (Minn.1986).
Marriage of Duffney v. Duffney 625 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Duffney v. Duffney 625 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(district court “should consider payments resulting from the stipulated property division to calculate a party’s ‘income’ for purposes of the child support guidelines”) (citation omitted); (financial resources includes “distribution of marital property to a spouse pursuant to a dissolution decree”).
Marriage of Swanson v. Swanson 583 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Swanson v. Swanson 583 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
5(c)(1) (1996) (court is to consider all earnings, income, and resources of parents, including real and personal property, in determining child support); (property settlement payments received pursuant to dissolution decree are properly considered financial resource available to parent in determining ability to pay child support).
Marriage of Gorz v. Gorz 552 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Gorz v. Gorz 552 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Mower County Human Services ex rel. Swancutt v. Swancutt 539 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Mower County Human Services ex rel. Swancutt v. Swancutt 539 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of Kuronen v. Kuronen 499 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Kuronen v. Kuronen 499 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
1 (lien or charge for child support may be made against party’s property); (monthly property settlement pay *54 ments received by noncustodial parent are financial resource to be considered in determining that parent’s ability to pay support).
Marriage of Karypis v. Karypis 458 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Marriage of Karypis v. Karypis 458 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Subsequent to those cases, however, the supreme court has said that “private agreements between parents with respect to family living arrangements should be encouraged.” , 682 n. 2 (Minn.1986).
Marriage of Mahady v. Mahady 448 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Mahady v. Mahady 448 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Minn.Stat § 588.12 (imprisonment for contempt dependent upon act being “in the power of the person to perform” at the time imprisonment ordered); Hopp, 279 Minn. at 175 , d at 217 (“when confinement is directed,” the contemnor should be “able to effect his release by compliance,” or by agreement to comply, “to the best of his ability”); (importance of explicit finding that contemnor is financially able to purge contempt by paying arrearages); Davis v. Davis, 280 Minn. 44, 46-48 , -199 (1968) (sa
Marriage of Biscoe v. Biscoe 443 N.W.2d 221 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Biscoe v. Biscoe 443 N.W.2d 221 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 439 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 439 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Stich v. Stich 435 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Stich v. Stich 435 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
arguing that until a modification was ordered, respondent had to make the payments as required by the 1984 order.
Marriage of Diedrich v. Diedrich 424 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Diedrich v. Diedrich 424 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-83 (Minn.1986); at 416 (Minn.App.1986).
Marriage of Nelson v. Quade 413 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Nelson v. Quade 413 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-83 (Minn.1986); aff’d, Stangel v. Stangel
Marriage of Quaid v. Quaid 403 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Quaid v. Quaid 403 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See, (“financial resources” include periodic payments received as a result of the distribution of marital property to a spouse pursuant to a dissolution decree); *907 (although obligor’s employment had been sporadic since the sale of his business, it was ap
Time-Share Systems, Inc. v. Schmidt 397 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Time-Share Systems, Inc. v. Schmidt 397 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512, 513
Marriage of Witeli v. Witeli 392 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Witeli v. Witeli 392 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 392 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Thompson v. Thompson 392 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Kroeplin v. Haugen 390 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Kroeplin v. Haugen 390 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Looyen v. Martinson 390 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Looyen v. Martinson 390 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The supreme court has stated that “[ijncarceration is unwarranted if a party is wholly unable to comply.”
Marriage of Schelmeske v. Veit 390 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Schelmeske v. Veit 390 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
6 (1984); (payments resulting from stipulated property division constitute “financial resource” under Minn. Stat. § 518.17 , subd.
Marriage of Huckbody v. Freeburg 388 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Huckbody v. Freeburg 388 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
While a de facto change in custody may not relieve respondent of his obligation to pay child support, he is entitled to know the whereabouts of his children.
Marriage of Lundell v. Lundell 387 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State, Department of Human Services v. Peterson 387 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State, Department of Human Services v. Peterson 387 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
ANALYSIS Our review of the trial court’s September 23 order is precluded by Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512
Marriage of Lundell v. Lundell 387 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-85 (Minn.1986); Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512, 513
Maxson v. Derence 384 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Maxson v. Derence 384 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
5(a) (1984); (when determining a party’s ability to pay child support, the trial court is to consider monthly property settlement payments).