Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Van Ruler, 378 N.W.2d 77.

305 citing documents.

State v. Johnson 831 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when “the record shows [that] the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.”
State v. Pegel 795 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Pegel 795 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(stating that if district court “considers reasons for departure but elects to impose the presumptive sentence,” an explanation for denying departure is not required).
State v. Webber 382 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Webber 382 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
This court has often stated that a sentencing court “has broad discretion and that we generally will not interfere with the exercise of that discretion.” -81 (Minn.Ct.App.1985).