Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Pekarek v. Wilking, 380 N.W.2d 161.

22 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(rejecting wife’s claim that she was entitled to attorney fees incurred on remand after first appeal, reasoning that wife “had ample opportunity to request attorney’s fees incurred on remand.
A18-1408 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“For a stipulation to stand, a meeting of minds on the essential terms of the agreement must have occurred.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. M. P. and L. R. D., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
see also Pekarek v. Wilking , (reviewing district court determination regarding p arties’ stipulation for abuse of discretion).
A17-0300 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Shirk v. Shirk 551 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Shirk v. Shirk 551 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Glorvigen v. Glorvigen 438 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Glorvigen v. Glorvigen 438 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(citing Tomscak, d at 466 ).
Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda 435 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda 435 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(citing Tomscak, d at 466 ).
In Re the Marriage of Steffan 423 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Marriage of Steffan 423 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Angier v. Angier 415 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Angier v. Angier 415 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Wolf 413 N.W.2d 620 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Wolf 413 N.W.2d 620 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Adams v. Adams 393 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Adams v. Adams 393 N.W.2d 508 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The trial court denied the motion to vacate the stipulation and judgment and decree
Selzer v. Selzer 393 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Selzer v. Selzer 393 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Kroeplin v. Haugen 390 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Kroeplin v. Haugen 390 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(citing Tomscak, d at 466 ).