Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hall, 406 N.W.2d 503.

66 citing documents.

State v. Klosterboer 529 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Klosterboer 529 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Hanson 514 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Hanson 514 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See State v. Hall (causing a complainant to submit by warning her to be quiet or she would be killed); , 877 n. 1 (Minn.1986) (suggesting, prior to statute’s effective date, that a teacher granting special privileges could “cause the complainant to submit”); Jackson v. State, 447
State v. Erickson 454 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Erickson 454 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Williams 451 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Williams 451 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
The court emphasized that the nature and effect of sexual abuse of children may not be within the knowledge and experience of a lay juror and that this testimony “is helpful and appropriate in cases of sexual abuse of children, and particularly of children as young [seven years old] as this complainant.” Myers, d at 610
State v. Davis 422 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Davis 422 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(clinical psychologist with Ph.D and about 60 active cases); (same psychologist).
State v. Willette 421 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Willette 421 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(evidence that complainant babysat for defendant and that he had threatened her was sufficient to support finding of “position of authority”); (evidence that complainant was occasionally left in defendant uncle’s care and that he threatened her with “trouble” if she
State v. Dana 416 N.W.2d 147 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Dana 416 N.W.2d 147 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Sandberg 406 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 1987
State v. Sandberg 406 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 1987