DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Sefkow v. Sefkow, 427 N.W.2d 203.

661 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Nazar Taher Mohammed Alfahed Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Nazar Taher Mohammed Alfahed Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The Centennial Fire Fighters Relief Association v. The City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County Auditor, Jonell Sawyer in … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The Centennial Fire Fighters Relief Association v. The City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County Auditor, Jonell Sawyer in … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lake George Park, L.L.C. v. IBM Mid-America Emps.
In re the Marriage of: James Donald Knight v. Maria Pieternella Knight Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: James Donald Knight v. Maria Pieternella Knight Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Sheikh Bilaal Muhammad Arafat v. Fadumo Noor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Sheikh Bilaal Muhammad Arafat v. Fadumo Noor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that appellate courts defer to district courts’ credibility determinations).
State of Minnesota v. James David Gertz, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Distinguished State of Minnesota v. James David Gertz, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“The function of the court of appeals is limited to identifying errors and then correcting them.”).
In the Matter of the Child of: C. A. L. and R. C. R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Child of: C. A. L. and R. C. R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that it is inappropriate for appellate courts to reweigh the evidence, find facts, or assess credibility on appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Trovato v. Vincent Henry Trovato Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Trovato v. Vincent Henry Trovato Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ahmadani Hassan Mohamed v. Eric Elijah Aaron Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ahmadani Hassan Mohamed v. Eric Elijah Aaron Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Chad Nelson, Below v. Troy Schlener, Carla Brown, Below, Minnesota Department of Human Services 859 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 2015
Chad Nelson, Below v. Troy Schlener, Carla Brown, Below, Minnesota Department of Human Services 859 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 2015
We have held that “[t]he function of the court of appeals is limited to identifying errors and then correcting them.” see also Minn. Ctr.
Gale Allen Rachuy v. Duluth Police Department Property Room Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timothy John Bozikowski v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Rachel Marie Davies f/k/a Rachel Marie Mehralian v. Ali Mehralian Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timothy John Bozikowski v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 203, 210 (Minn. 1988).
Gale Allen Rachuy v. Duluth Police Department Property Room Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Rachel Marie Davies f/k/a Rachel Marie Mehralian v. Ali Mehralian Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating, in an appeal from grant of an HRO, that “[c]redibility determinations are the province of the trier of fact”).
In re the Marriage of: Paul Timothy Patock v. Cathy Liane Patock n/k/a Cathy Liane Mehr, County of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Paul Timothy Patock v. Cathy Liane Patock n/k/a Cathy Liane Mehr, County of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jesse Marshall, Relator v. St. John�s Lutheran Home of Albert Lea, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jesse Marshall, Relator v. St. John�s Lutheran Home of Albert Lea, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“The function of the court of appeals is limited to identifying errors and then correcting them.”).
DuPrece Lashae Slaughter v. Anissa Lachelle Black, Lisa Danielle Willis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DuPrece Lashae Slaughter v. Anissa Lachelle Black, Lisa Danielle Willis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Lee Anthony Holmes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Lee Anthony Holmes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Will Alexander 855 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Will Alexander 855 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that, on appeal, appellate courts “neither reconcile conflicting evidence nor decide issues of witness credibility, which are exclusively the province of the factfinder”).
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Appellate courts defer to district court credibility determinations, even when those determinations are implicit
Jeffrey Philip Dawson v. Sara Rhea Taylor, County of Dakota, Intervenor. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jeffrey Philip Dawson v. Sara Rhea Taylor, County of Dakota, Intervenor. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Kay Beltrand v. Thomas Leo Beltrand Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Kay Beltrand v. Thomas Leo Beltrand Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Andrew William Serres Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Andrew William Serres Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“The function of the court of appeals is limited to identifying errors and then correcting them.”).
William O. Bradley v. Carol M. Kelley Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage Association 850 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
William O. Bradley v. Carol M. Kelley Minn. Ct. App. 2014
When making this determination, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the finding being challenged, and defer to the district court’s credibility determinations
Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage Association 850 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Jonathan Conneely v. Hannah Stancek, f/k/a Hannah Conneely Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Jonathan Conneely v. Hannah Stancek, f/k/a Hannah Conneely Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Hniya Abdenbi Kouttay v. Ali Jama Yahia Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Hniya Abdenbi Kouttay v. Ali Jama Yahia Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In doing so, we review the record “in the light most favorable to the [district] court’s findings,” and we defer to the district court’s credibility determinations, d 203, 210 (Minn. 1988).