Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Flores, 418 N.W.2d 150.

185 citing documents.

State v. Smith 674 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 2004
State v. Smith 674 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 2004
State v. Porter 674 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Porter 674 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Peterson 673 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 2004
State v. Peterson 673 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 2004
State v. Johnson 672 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Johnson 672 N.W.2d 235 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. DeYoung 672 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. DeYoung 672 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“[J]ury instructions must be viewed in their entirety to determine whether they fairly and adequately explained the law of the case.”
State v. Noble 669 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Noble 669 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
When reviewing a jury charge, an appellate court must view the instructions in their entirety “to determine whether they fairly and adequately explained the law of the case.” (citation omitted).
State v. Kycia 665 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Kycia 665 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Copeland 656 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Copeland 656 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Lindsey 654 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Lindsey 654 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Coonrod 652 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Coonrod 652 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Ihle 640 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 2002
State v. Ihle 640 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 2002
State v. Baird 640 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Baird 640 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
On review, an appellate court must view the jury instructions in their entirety “to determine whether they fairly and adequately explained the law[.]”
State v. Compassionate Home Care, Inc. 639 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Compassionate Home Care, Inc. 639 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Cyrette 636 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Cyrette 636 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Richardson 633 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Richardson 633 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Charles 634 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Charles 634 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“[J]ury instructions must be viewed in their entirety to determine whether they fairly and adequately explain the law of the case.” (citation omitted).
State v. Kuhnau 622 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 2001
State v. Kuhnau 622 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 2001
State v. Walthers 620 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Walthers 620 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
.2d 661, 675 (Minn.1998) (allowing evidence of a prior bad act to show the strained relationship between defendant and his mother to show motive for killing her); (allowing evidence of' defendant’s prior attempt to poison the victim to show the strained relationship between the victim and defendant and motive and intent for murder); (admitting testimony of defendant’s threats against the victim’s friends to show motive and intent); (allowing evidence of other robberies involving defendant to sho
State v. Broulik 606 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 2000
State v. Broulik 606 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 2000
“The jury instructions must be viewed in their entirety to determine whether they fairly and adequately explained the law of the case.”
State v. Reckinger 603 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Bauer 598 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1999
State v. Bauer 598 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1999
“Character evidence which tends to show the ‘strained relationship’ between the accused and the victim is relevant to establishing motive and intent and is therefore admissible.” ().
State v. Williams 593 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1999
State v. Williams 593 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1999
State v. Collins 580 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Collins 580 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Spann 574 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1998
State v. Spann 574 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1998
State v. Loewen 565 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Loewen 565 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Walen 563 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1997