Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co., 427 N.W.2d 244.
- Pepper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 813 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 2012
- Pepper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 813 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 2012
- Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
-
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd.
680 N.W.2d 79
Minn. 2004
Co., -46 (Minn.1988); Myers v. State Farm Mut.
- Kelly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 666 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 2003
-
Kelly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
666 N.W.2d 328
Minn. 2003
Co., (noting that because first-party coverage and third-party coverage contemplate different risks they are assigned different prices).
- Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 626 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 2001
- Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 626 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 2001
- Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 612 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
612 N.W.2d 887
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., Meyer, d at 535 ; Linder v. State Farm Mut.
- Northrup v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 601 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Northrup v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
601 N.W.2d 900
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., (observing that claimant, even though occupying an uninsured car owned by his stepfather, would be entitled to recover first party, uninsured motorist benefits under any policy he had purchased on his own car).
- West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co. 586 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co. 586 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- Ka Ying Vue v. State Farm Insurance Companies 582 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1998
- Ka Ying Vue v. State Farm Insurance Companies 582 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1998
- Wintz v. Colonial Ins. Co. of California 542 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1996
- Wintz v. Colonial Ins. Co. of California 542 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1996
- Wintz v. Colonial Insurance Co. of California 526 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Wintz v. Colonial Insurance Co. of California
526 N.W.2d 375
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Co., -46 (Minn.1988) (policy provision excluding UM coverage if uninsured vehicle is owned by insured is enforceable where claimant’s stepfather owned both the uninsured car that caused the injury and the UM policy under which claimant sought recovery); see also Myers v. State Farm Mut.
- Jensen v. United Fire & Casualty Co. 524 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Jensen v. United Fire & Casualty Co.
524 N.W.2d 536
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Jensen argues that Myers does not apply here because there is no policy provision that defines “an underinsured motor vehicle as excluding a vehicle owned by or furnished for the regular use of the named insured.” (denying coverage pursuant to Myers on the ground that “the same person owns the at-fault vehicle and the policy under which the injured claimant seeks first-party coverage”).
- Perfetti v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 486 N.W.2d 440 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Perfetti v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York
486 N.W.2d 440
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co., -46 (Minn.1988); American Family Ins.
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Harvey 474 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Harvey
474 N.W.2d 189
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Co., see also Laffen v. Auto-Owners Ins.
- Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 451 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 451 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Vieths v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 441 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Vieths v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.
441 N.W.2d 575
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(uninsured motorist) , (Minn.1989) (underinsured motorist case where the court stated that “to hold the insurer liable to pay damages resulting from the negligent use of the insured motor vehicle pursuant to both the liability coverage and the U
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Zurich Insurance Co. 439 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Zurich Insurance Co.
439 N.W.2d 751
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 301 Minn. 10, 18-19 , -57 (1974)
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Luhman 438 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Luhman 438 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Laffen v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 429 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Laffen v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 429 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1988