Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc., 447 N.W.2d 180.

33 citing documents.

Tami Conn, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Hayer Co. Inc., which held that the MWCA’s exclusivity provision precludes an injured employee’s separate action for disability discrimination under the MHRA.
Daniel v. City of Minneapolis 923 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 2019
Overruled Daniel v. City of Minneapolis 923 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 2019
Hayer Co. , reverse the decision of the court of appeals, and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings.
Gluba Ex Rel. Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry 735 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2007
Gluba Ex Rel. Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry 735 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2007
Hayer Co., Inc., -86 (Minn.1989), is inapposite.
Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co. 725 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 2006
Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co. 725 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 2006
Meintsma v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 2004
Meintsma v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 2004
Hayer Co., -84 (Minn.1989).
U.S. Specialty Insurance Co. v. James Courtney Law Office, P.A. 662 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 2003
U.S. Specialty Insurance Co. v. James Courtney Law Office, P.A. 662 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 2003
Hayer Co., Inc., -4 (Minn.1989) (citing 2A A. Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 65.11 (1988)).
Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage Banking 605 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage Banking 605 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hayer Co., Inc., rev’d on other grounds
Stelling v. Hanson Silo Co. 563 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Stelling v. Hanson Silo Co. 563 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Hayer Co., (construction of exclusive remedy provision of workers’ compensation act); (existence of legal duty).
Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 561 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 561 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Williams v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc. 551 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1996
Williams v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc. 551 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 1996
Hayer Co., Inc., -86 (Minn.1989).
Hix v. Minnesota Workers' Compensation Assigned Risk Plan 520 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hix v. Minnesota Workers' Compensation Assigned Risk Plan 520 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hunter v. Nash Finch Co. 498 N.W.2d 759 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Hunter v. Nash Finch Co. 498 N.W.2d 759 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Hayer Co., he was precluded from bringing a discrimination claim because he had already received worker’s compensation benefits for his injuries.
MT Properties, Inc. v. CMC Real Estate Corp. 481 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
MT Properties, Inc. v. CMC Real Estate Corp. 481 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Maktari v. Ford Motor Co. 481 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1992
Maktari v. Ford Motor Co. 481 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1992
Hayer Co., Inc., and it seems to us unlikely that the legislature intended to put an employee who has demonstrated the ability to perform a “3e” job and a willingness to accept whatever other “appropriate work” the employer provides in a worse position than the employee in the typical situation covered by subdivision 3j.
Investment Co. Institute v. Hatch 477 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Investment Co. Institute v. Hatch 477 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Colonial Insurance Co. of California v. Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan 457 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Colonial Insurance Co. of California v. Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan 457 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp. 448 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp. 448 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1990