Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Estate of Hartz v. Nelson, 437 N.W.2d 749.

22 citing documents.

Big-D Construction Midwest, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We also review an unobjected-to special verdict form “to determine whether there 12 is an error of fundamental law or controlling principle.” Estate of Hartz v. Nelson , review denied (Minn. July 12, 1989).
Megan Guetzkow, as mother and natural guardian of E.I., a minor, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Estate of Hartz v. Nelson , review denied (Minn. July 12, 1989).
Midland Funding LLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. July 12, 1989); see also Minn. R. Civ.
Bay Side Recycling Company LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. July 12, 1989); see also Minn. R. Civ.
Timothy T. Childs v. North River Road Condominium Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timothy T. Childs v. North River Road Condominium Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A jury instruction is reviewable by an appellate court “only if there has been a motion for a new trial in which such matters have been assigned as error.” review denied (Minn. July 12, 1989).
JEM ACRES, LLC v. Bruno 764 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
JEM ACRES, LLC v. Bruno 764 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
We therefore review the jury instructions “to determine whether there is an error of fundamental law or controlling principle.” review denied (Minn. July 12, 1989).
Trigger's Supper Club v. Sunridge Farms, Inc. 647 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Shigellosis Litigation 647 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Trigger's Supper Club v. Sunridge Farms, Inc. 647 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See Hartz v. Nelson (In re Estate of Hartz), (noting failure to object to special verdict prior to jury submission constitutes waiver).
In Re Shigellosis Litigation 647 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See Hartz v. Nelson (In re Estate of Hartz), (Minn.App.
H Window Co. v. Cascade Wood Products, Inc. 596 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
H Window Co. v. Cascade Wood Products, Inc. 596 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
review denied (Minn. July 12,1989).
Trisko v. City of Waite Park 566 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Trisko v. City of Waite Park 566 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(holding that when allegedly inadmissible evidence has been admitted without objection, a party may not question its admissibility for the first time on appeal), review denied (Minn. July 12, 1989); see also Crystal Beach Bay Ass'n v. Koochiching County, 309 Minn. 52, 56-57 , (19
Nugent v. Kerr 543 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Nugent v. Kerr 543 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
review denied (Minn. July 12, 1989), the jury heard no evidence of the defendant’s financial condition, and this court remanded the matter to the trial court to consider the defendant’s financial condition.
Mrozka v. Archdiocese of St. Paul & Mpls. 482 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Mrozka v. Archdiocese of St. Paul & Mpls. 482 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(quoting Hodder, d at 835 ), pet.
Bradley v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 471 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Bradley v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 471 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
3265 , 106 L.Ed.2d 610 (1989); Stanger v. Gordon, 309 Minn. 215 , (reducing $12,900 punitive damages award to $7,500); (reversing excessive punitive damages award of $700,000 and remanding for reconsideration), pet.