Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Carlson v. Lilyerd, 449 N.W.2d 185.

32 citing documents.

Hubbard County v. James Card, Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Ass’n., (stating a court is not bound by “clarifying” label of amendment; rather, it must determine whether amendment “substantively modifies prior law”); (stating an amendment is a clarification when legislature quickly responds to a judicial determination that did not reflect a statute’s original legislative intent), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Audrey Maria Negri v. Chad Andrew Patton-Minder Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(emphasis omitted) (quotation omitted); see 12 - 91 (Minn. App. 1989) (addressing retroactive application of amendments of statutes), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Deborah J. Palmer, surviving spouse and Trustee for the heirs of Gary J. Palmer v. Walker Jamar Company … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Ouradnik v. Ouradnik 897 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Faegre & Benson, LLP v. R & R INVESTORS 772 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Faegre & Benson, LLP v. R & R INVESTORS 772 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
P. 12.02 (providing that a motion on the pleadings shall be treated as a summary judgment motion when materials outside the pleadings are considered); (explaining that when the “case involves a motion for judgment on the pleadings where more than just the pleadings were considered, we review the trial court’s determinations under a summary judgment standard”), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Dahl v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 742 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Dahl v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 742 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
P. 12.02; review denied (Minn. Mar.
Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Rooney v. Rooney 669 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
*372 (Minn.App.1989), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Peoples State Bank Truman v. Triplett 633 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Peoples State Bank Truman v. Triplett 633 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Engvall v. Soo Line Railroad Company 617 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Engvall v. Soo Line Railroad Company 617 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Murray v. Minncor 596 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Murray v. Minncor 596 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
P. 12.03; review denied (Minn. Mar.
Bliss v. Stevens 544 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Bliss v. Stevens 544 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Matter of Welfare of SAC 529 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Matter of Welfare of SAC 529 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-91 (Minn.App.1989) (language in preamble, though not dispositive, may be considered in construing legislative intent), pet.
Wenner v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul 505 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Wenner v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul 505 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Lilyerd v. Carlson 499 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1993
Lilyerd v. Carlson 499 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 1993
Lilyerd v. Carlson 478 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Lilyerd v. Carlson 478 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
On appeal, this court held that the statute in effect at the time PCA assigned its interest as a junior lienholder to respondent did not define “immediately preceding former owner.” pet.
Ludowese v. Redmann 479 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Ludowese v. Redmann 479 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(amendment may be read retroactively where it clarifies the statute) pet.
Omdahl v. Hadler 459 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Omdahl v. Hadler 459 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Preston v. Junge 458 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Preston v. Junge 458 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1990