Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Brown, 455 N.W.2d 65.

37 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Raynold Sleen Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Brown , review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
State of Minnesota v. Charles Fornizy Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
State of Minnesota v. Rene Mercedes Rivas-Hernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
State of Minnesota v. Duane John BlackBull Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
State of Minnesota v. Stephen Gene Shawnoskey Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Questions and commands generally are not intended as assertions, and therefore cannot constitute hearsay.” United States v. Thomas , 451 F.3d 543, 548 (8 th Cir. 2006); see also State v. 9 Brown, (concluding that declarant’s statement “do what you came to do” was not assertive and therefore not excludable as hearsay), review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
State of Minnesota v. Xa Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Xa Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that this court will not reverse unless the district court’s erroneous evidentiary ruling substantially influenced the jury to convict), review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
State v. Grigsby 806 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Grigsby 806 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
616; State v. [Gary] Brown, -70 (Minn.App.1990) (holding that possible gang membership of various witnesses would speak to their biases, but that preclusion of testimony on this issue was harmless error when testimony of alleged gang-member witnesses was consistent with that of witnesses not alleged to be gang members), review denied (Minn. J
State v. Leake 699 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 2005
State v. Leake 699 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 2005
See, rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990); rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Jacobson 681 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Jacobson 681 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
State v. Yang 644 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2002
State v. Yang 644 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2002
25, 1999); rev. denied (Minn. Jul.
State v. Valentine 630 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Valentine 630 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
to argue that the departure should be upheld because J.D.
State v. Bakken 604 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Bakken 604 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
State v. Olson 515 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Olson 515 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Horning 511 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Horning 511 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Even if the trial court errs in an evidentiary ruling, “[a] reversal is warranted only when the error substantially influences the jury to convict.” (), pet.
State v. Palmer 507 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Palmer 507 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Even if the trial court errs in an evidentiary ruling, “[a] reversal is warranted only when the error substantially influences the jury to convict.” (), pet.
State v. Jaworsky 505 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Jaworsky 505 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Lonergan 505 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Lonergan 505 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Christopherson 500 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Christopherson 500 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Barber 494 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Barber 494 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Patterson 493 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Patterson 493 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Even if the trial court errs in an evidentiary ruling, “[a] reversal is warranted only when the error substantially influences the jury to convict.” (), pet.
State v. Hines 458 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Hines 458 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1990