DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Brown, 455 N.W.2d 65.

37 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    See State v. Brown , review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    “Questions and commands generally are not intended as assertions, and therefore cannot constitute hearsay.” United States v. Thomas , 451 F.3d 543, 548 (8 th Cir. 2006); see also State v. 9 Brown, (concluding that declarant’s statement “do what you came to do” was not assertive and therefore not excludable as hearsay), review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
  • State of Minnesota v. Xa Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Xa Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    (holding that this court will not reverse unless the district court’s erroneous evidentiary ruling substantially influenced the jury to convict), review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
  • State v. Grigsby 806 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
  • State v. Grigsby 806 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
    616; State v. [Gary] Brown, -70 (Minn.App.1990) (holding that possible gang membership of various witnesses would speak to their biases, but that preclusion of testimony on this issue was harmless error when testimony of alleged gang-member witnesses was consistent with that of witnesses not alleged to be gang members), review denied (Minn. J
  • State v. Leake 699 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Leake 699 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 2005
    See, rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990); rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
  • State v. Jacobson 681 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Jacobson 681 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
  • State v. Yang 644 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2002
  • State v. Yang 644 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2002
    25, 1999); rev. denied (Minn. Jul.
  • State v. Valentine 630 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Valentine 630 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    to argue that the departure should be upheld because J.D.
  • State v. Bakken 604 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Bakken 604 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
  • State v. Olson 515 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Olson 515 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Horning 511 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Horning 511 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    Even if the trial court errs in an evidentiary ruling, “[a] reversal is warranted only when the error substantially influences the jury to convict.” (), pet.
  • State v. Palmer 507 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Palmer 507 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    Even if the trial court errs in an evidentiary ruling, “[a] reversal is warranted only when the error substantially influences the jury to convict.” (), pet.
  • State v. Jaworsky 505 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Jaworsky 505 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Lonergan 505 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Lonergan 505 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Christopherson 500 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Christopherson 500 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Barber 494 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Barber 494 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Patterson 493 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Patterson 493 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    Even if the trial court errs in an evidentiary ruling, “[a] reversal is warranted only when the error substantially influences the jury to convict.” (), pet.
  • State v. Hines 458 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Hines 458 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1990