Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc., 463 N.W.2d 722.

69 citing documents.

Anker v. Little 541 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Anker v. Little 541 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Hickman, d at 14 (holding Minn. Const, art. I, § 8 protects remedies only for causes of action that vested at common law); see also Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc., (recognizing the legislature may abrogate common law remedies to further legitimate objectives).
Lundman v. McKown 530 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lundman v. McKown 530 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.
State v. Knutson 523 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Knutson 523 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc., (affirming correct decision on different reasoning).
Wirth v. M.A. Mortenson/Shal Associates 520 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Wirth v. M.A. Mortenson/Shal Associates 520 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
*177 The legislature may constitutionally abolish a common law right without providing a reasonable substitute if “it is pursuing a permissible, legitimate legislative objective.” see also Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc., (recognizing that remedies are not vested rights and parties thus do not have a vested right to particular remedies).
Carousel Automobiles, Inc. v. Gherity 511 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Carousel Automobiles, Inc. v. Gherity 511 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Thuma v. Kroschel 506 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Thuma v. Kroschel 506 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
52.01; Sckweich v. Ziegler, Inc.
S.L.D. v. Kranz 498 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
S.L.D. v. Kranz 498 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bains v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc. 497 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bains v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc. 497 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.
Strauss v. Thorne 490 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Harper v. Herman 487 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Harper v. Herman 487 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.