Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, 457 N.W.2d 188.

206 citing documents.

Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co. 732 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 2007
Ctr., (stating that the affidavit or answers to interrogatories must include “specific details concerning their experts’ expected testimony, including the applicable standard of care, the acts or omissions that plaintiffs allege violated the standard of care and an outline of the chain of causation that all
Bukkuri v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 729 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Bukkuri v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 729 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Mercer v. Andersen 715 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Mercer v. Andersen 715 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Noske v. Friedberg 713 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Noske v. Friedberg 713 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester 690 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2005
Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester 690 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2005
Ctr., -91 (Minn.1990) (noting that “the legislature contemplated procedural reform directed at elimination of ‘frivolous cases’ ” in adopting the statute).
Gada v. Dedefo 684 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Gada v. Dedefo 684 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Maudsley v. Pederson 676 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Maudsley v. Pederson 676 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Ctr., ); see also Teffeteller v. Univ.
State v. Jones 678 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2004
State v. Jones 678 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2004
Moreno v. City of Minneapolis 676 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Moreno v. City of Minneapolis 676 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Ctr., rehearing denied (Minn. July 17,1990).
JAS Apartments, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 668 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
JAS Apartments, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 668 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Kelbel 648 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 2002
State v. Kelbel 648 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 2002
Kolton v. County of Anoka 645 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 2002
Teffeteller v. University of Minnesota 645 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 2002
Teffeteller v. University of Minnesota 645 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 2002
Ctr., Stroud, ; Lindberg, ; Anderson, .
Kolton v. County of Anoka 645 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 2002
In Re the Welfare of J.K. 641 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Welfare of J.K. 641 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Shaw Acquisition Co. v. Bank of Elk River 639 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 2002
Shaw Acquisition Co. v. Bank of Elk River 639 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 2002
Gomon v. Northland Family Physicians, Ltd. 625 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Gomon v. Northland Family Physicians, Ltd. 625 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Weber v. Tuck 620 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Weber v. Tuck 620 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Ctr., including whether a duty is owed.
Stansell v. City of Northfield 618 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Stansell v. City of Northfield 618 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Ctr., Associated Builders & aff'd
State, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District v. Horner 617 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 2000
Brown v. State 617 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 617 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Brown v. State 617 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 617 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Tousignant v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MN 615 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 2000
Tousignant v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MN 615 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 2000
Improvement of County Ditch No. 86, Branch 1, County of Blue Earth v. Phillips 614 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Improvement of County Ditch No. 86, Branch 1, County of Blue Earth v. Phillips 614 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Manson v. State, Department of Employee Relations 613 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Manson v. State, Department of Employee Relations 613 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re the Speed Limit for the Union Pacific Railroad Ex Rel. City of Shakopee 610 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re the Speed Limit for the Union Pacific Railroad Ex Rel. City of Shakopee 610 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 2000

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by