Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Baumann, 459 N.W.2d 923.

34 citing documents.

Brenda Becker, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co. v.] Baumann, [], [(Minn. 1983).
Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 887 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 887 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Isaac v. Vy Thanh Ho 825 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 2013
Isaac v. Vy Thanh Ho 825 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 2013
Van Kampen v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. 754 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Van Kampen v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. 754 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
George v. Evenson 754 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 2008
George v. Evenson 754 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 2008
Kluball v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 706 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Kluball v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 706 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
is instructive in assigning the burden of demonstrating prejudice.
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 661 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 661 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Ruddy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 596 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Ruddy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 596 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(subrogation right accrues upon payment of contractual obligation).
Gusk v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1997
Gusk v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1997
Schmidt, d at 262-63; see also Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Cas.
Schoffman Ex Rel. Schoffman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 557 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Schoffman Ex Rel. Schoffman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 557 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(absent notice of intended settlement with tortfeasors, release by plaintiff is deemed prejudicial to plaintiffs UIM insurer).
Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. 548 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1996
Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. 548 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1996
Elwood v. Horace Mann Insurance Co. 531 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Elwood v. Horace Mann Insurance Co. 531 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
the supreme court held that a Schmidt notice should provide a UIM carrier with the following information: 1.
Behrens v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 520 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Behrens v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 520 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Richards v. Milwaukee Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1994
Richards v. Milwaukee Insurance Co. 518 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1994
Hopkins Ex Rel. LaFontaine v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 474 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hopkins Ex Rel. LaFontaine v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 474 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Principal Financial Group v. Allstate Insurance Co. 472 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Sutherland v. Allstate Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Sutherland v. Allstate Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
the supreme court held a letter far more vague than the one in the present case satisfied the requirement where it notified the insurer not only that the insured considers the tortfeasor’s liability insurance inadequate to fully compensate her for her injuries and that she will resort to her underinsured