Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bowers, 482 N.W.2d 774.

25 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Robert Earl Boyce Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Robert Earl Boyce Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-69 (Minn. 1991); -78 (Minn. 1992).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Moore, d at 107; -78 (Minn. 1992); -69 (Minn. 1991).
Ries v. State 920 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 2018
Ries v. State 920 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 2018
On the other hand, peremptory challenges may be exercised for any reason, such as "sudden impressions, gestures, or a mere feeling," State v. Bowers , , 776 (Minn. 1992) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted), as long as its purpose is not discriminatory, see State v. Pendleton , , 726-27 (Minn. 2007).
State of Minnesota v. Maureen Ndidiamaka Onyelobi 879 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Maureen Ndidiamaka Onyelobi 879 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 2016
cause, which are “limited” to instances in which the “juror cannot try the case impartially and without prejudice,” peremptory challenges may be based on “sudden impressions, gestures, or a mere feeling”; indeed, “[a] prosecutor may exercise a peremptory challenge for any reason at all, as long as that reason is related to his view concerning the outcome of the case to be tried.” (internal quotation marks omitted); (“Peremptory challenges allow a party to strike a prospective juror that the part
State of Minnesota v. Amanda Lea Peltier 874 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Amanda Lea Peltier 874 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 2016
(stating that medical examiner’s testimony that the depth of the victim’s stab wound indicated that the stabbing was an intentional act “was only stating the obvious,” given that the knife blade was shorter than the wound was long).
State of Minnesota v. Calvin James Jennings Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Calvin James Jennings Minn. Ct. App. 2015
the supreme court declined to extend Batson to an appeal that concerned a challenge for cause.
State of Minnesota v. Jaylin Deshawn Dubose Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jaylin Deshawn Dubose Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Cortez Gray Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Cortez Gray Minn. Ct. App. 2014
the supreme court noted that neither the Supreme Court nor any state court has applied Batson to for- cause dismissals and that “peremptory challenges are quite different from challenges for cause.” The supreme court said that “it would be a rare case indeed in which a Batson inquiry would be ne
State v. Riddley 776 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 2009
State v. Riddley 776 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 2009
State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
State v. Reiners 664 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2003
State v. Reiners 664 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2003
See, (holding that juror’s admitted biases provided a sufficient basis for removal for cause even though she was the only African American on the panel and she had ultimately said she could be fair).
State v. Bauer 598 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1999
State v. Bauer 598 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1999
With respect to the first two factors, where we held that' there was no" error in permitting a medical examiner to testify that the depth of a stab wound indicated that'the stabbing was an “intentional” act.
State v. Parker 585 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1998
State v. Parker 585 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1998