Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite ZumBerge v. Northern States Power Co., 481 N.W.2d 103.

39 citing documents.

Patrick Simondet, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Russell, d at 899 (quotation omitted); (stating “the verdict must stand unless it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence”), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Minnesota Solar, LLC, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See ZumBerge v. N. States Power Co. , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Northern States Power Company, Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, Aegis Insurance Services, LTD., and other interested insurers as … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(concluding that economic-loss doctrine did not bar tort claims where the damages arose from actions outside of the parties’ sales transaction), review denied (Minn. Apr.
County of Hennepin v. 1010 Metrodome Square, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
County of Hennepin v. 1010 Metrodome Square, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
–08 (Minn. App. 1992) (noting that “the decision to treat electricity as subject to Article 2 is a legal question as yet unsettled in Minnesota.
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
review denied (Minn. Apr.
Dostal v. Curran 679 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Dostal v. Curran 679 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
On appeal from the denial of a motion for a new trial, the jury’s “verdict must stand unless it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict.” review denied (Minn.29 Apr.
Heine v. Simon 674 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Heine v. Simon 674 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
On appeal from the denial of a motion for a new trial, the verdict will not be set aside “unless it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
Taney v. Independent School District No. 624 673 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Taney v. Independent School District No. 624 673 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
On appeal, the verdict will not be disturbed “unless it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
Thompson v. Hughart 664 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Thompson v. Hughart 664 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
On appeal from a denial of a motion for a new trial, “the verdict must stand unless it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
Woehrle v. City of Mankato 647 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Woehrle v. City of Mankato 647 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
A district court’s denial of a new-trial motion “must stand unless it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“On appeal from a denial of a motion for a new trial, the verdict must stand unless it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.” (citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Kaiser-Bauer v. Mullan 609 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Kaiser-Bauer v. Mullan 609 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
We will similarly affirm the denial of a motion for a new trial unless the verdict is “manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
Shaw v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota 594 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Shaw v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota 594 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
review denied (Minn. Apr.
Johns v. Harborage I, Ltd. 585 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Johns v. Harborage I, Ltd. 585 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
review denied, (Minn. Apr.
Custom Design Studio, a Division of L.B. Baron Properties, Inc. v. Chloe, Inc. 584 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Custom Design Studio, a Division of L.B. Baron Properties, Inc. v. Chloe, Inc. 584 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
On appeal from the denial of a motion for a new trial, our review is limited to determining whether the verdict is “manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict.” review denied (Minn. April 29, 1992).
Berg v. Nelson 559 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Berg v. Nelson 559 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Similarly, on appeal from a denial of a motion for a new trial, the verdict must stand unless “it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
Stowell v. Cloquet Co-Op Credit Union 542 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Stowell v. Cloquet Co-Op Credit Union 542 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
“On appeal from a denial of a motion for a new trial, the verdict must stand unless it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
American Standard Insurance Co. v. Dang Van Le 539 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
American Standard Insurance Co. v. Dang Van Le 539 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
“On appeal from a denial of a motion for a new trial, the verdict must stand unless it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.”
Wenzel v. Mathies 542 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Wenzel v. Mathies 542 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
See, review denied (Minn. Apr.
Gilman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 526 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Gilman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 526 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
“On appeal from a denial of a motion for a new trial, the verdict must stand unless it is manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.” pet.
International Financial Services, Inc. v. Franz 515 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
International Financial Services, Inc. v. Franz 515 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1994