Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wegener v. Commissioner of Revenue, 505 N.W.2d 612.

100 citing documents.

Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 659 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2003
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 659 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2003
Mattice v. Minnesota Property Insurance Placement 655 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Mattice v. Minnesota Property Insurance Placement 655 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Wegener v. Comm’r of Revenue
County of Benton v. Kismet Investors, Inc. 653 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
County of Benton v. Kismet Investors, Inc. 653 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Wegener v. Comm’r of Revenue
Msi v. Lmcit 646 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 646 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Msi v. Lmcit 646 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
§ 645.17(1) (2000); review denied (Minn. Feb.
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust 646 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
§ 645.17(1) (2000); Wegener v. Comm’r of Revenue, review denied (Minn. Feb.
Occhino v. Grover 640 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Occhino v. Grover 640 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Wegener v. Comm’r of Revenue
Stansell v. City of Northfield 618 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Stansell v. City of Northfield 618 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Friday 617 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Friday 617 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
*596 (quotation and citation omitted; emphasis added).
Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of Ramsey 609 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 2000
Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of Ramsey 609 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 2000
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 602 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 602 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Although the plain-meaning rule is well established, “our inquiry does not end with the literal words of the statute.”
Erickson v. State 599 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Erickson v. State 599 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
9, 1996); (holding court has power to reject statute’s plain language under such circumstances).
State v. Dendy 598 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Dendy 598 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Guderian v. Olmsted County 595 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Guderian v. Olmsted County 595 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Wegener v. Comm’r of Revenue
Boutin v. LaFleur 591 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1999
Boutin v. LaFleur 591 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1999
§ 645.16; Wegener v. Comm’r of Revenue, (concluding that a court may look beyond plain language only if the literal meaning of a statute leads to an absurd result that utterly departs from legislative purpose).
State v. Taylor 590 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Taylor 590 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Marsden v. Crawford 589 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Marsden v. Crawford 589 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Haghighi v. Russian-American Broadcasting Co. 577 N.W.2d 927 Minn. 1998
Haghighi v. Russian-American Broadcasting Co. 577 N.W.2d 927 Minn. 1998
See Wegener v. Comm’r of Revenue
In re Welfare of R.W. 575 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In re Welfare of R.W. 575 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Ruberto v. County of Washington 572 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1997
Ruberto v. County of Washington 572 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1997
Furthermore, that administrative requirements associated with the assessment of market valuations are procedural only and should not have a substantive effect absent evidence of substantial prejudice: [Ajlthough provisions designed to enforce the collection of the tax or to divest the owner of his property for failure
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Boyne 563 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Boyne 563 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(quoting Winters v. City of Duluth, 82 Minn. 127, 129 , 84 N.W.
Olson v. Ford Motor Co. 558 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1997
Olson v. Ford Motor Co. 558 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1997
Anker v. Little 541 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Anker v. Little 541 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).
State v. Peterson 535 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Peterson 535 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(court obliged to reject construction leading to absurd results).
Kay v. Fairview Riverside Hospital 531 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Kay v. Fairview Riverside Hospital 531 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(in interpreting a statute, courts should follow its plain meaning and reject a construction leading to an absurd or unreasonable result that departs from the statute’s purpose).
Dorn v. Peterson 512 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Dorn v. Peterson 512 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-15, 617 (Minn. 1993) (rejecting plain language only when it leads to absurd or unreasonable results which utterly depart from the purpose of the statute).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by