DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Harwell, 515 N.W.2d 105.

24 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    rev. denied (Minn. June 15, 1994).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    The instructions provided to the jury accurately stated the law and sufficiently enabled the jury to “resolve their concerns.” rev. denied (Minn. June 15, 1994).
  • State of Minnesota v. Alex Cennedi Closmore Minn. Ct. App. 2014
  • State of Minnesota v. Alex Cennedi Closmore Minn. Ct. App. 2014
    review denied (June 15, 1994).
  • State v. Robideau 783 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Robideau 783 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    See, e.g., State v. O’Brien, review denied (Minn. June 15, 1994).
  • Dillon v. State 781 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • Dillon v. State 781 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    See, e.g., State v. O’Brien, (upholding double durational departure when only one aggravating factor was present); (holding that particular cruelty alone can justify double departure), review denied (Minn. June 15,1994).
  • In Re the Welfare of J.A.D. 603 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • In Re the Welfare of J.A.D. 603 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    review denied (Minn. June 15, 1994).
  • State v. Keehn 554 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Keehn 554 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
    (reversing restitution award to police agency’s Drug Task Force because the agency was neither a natural person nor a corporation for purposes of statutory restitution), remanded on other grounds, (reversing restitution award to the Missing Children’s Fund because the fund was not a victim of defendant’s crime), review denied (Minn. June 15, 1994).
  • State v. Esler 553 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Esler 553 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
    “[0]nly the victim is entitled to receive restitution.” review denied (Minn. June 15, 1994).
  • State v. Crims 540 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Crims 540 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    -09 (Minn.App.1994), review denied (Minn. June 15, 1994); see also Minn. R.Crim.P.
  • State v. Murray 529 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Murray 529 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Dillon 529 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Dillon 529 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    (ruling that Missing Children's Fund is not a "victim" entitled to restitution), pet.
  • State v. Maidi 520 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Maidi 520 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Dendy 520 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Dendy 520 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    “[Ojnly the victim is entitled to receive restitution.” pet.