Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Trusts Created by Hormel, 504 N.W.2d 505.

44 citing documents.

In RE: The Matter of the Irrevocable Trust of Myron E. Childs, dated November 2, 2000 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In RE: The Matter of the Irrevocable Trust of Myron E. Childs, dated November 2, 2000 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Created by Hormel, rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: Z. C. W., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: Z. C. W., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Whether collateral estoppel is available is a mixed question of law and fact subject to de novo review.” rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Trust of the Thomas Karakash Family Trust and the Ann Karakash Family Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Created by Hormel, rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
A21-0035 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Created by Hormel, d 505, 511 (Minn. 1993), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of Shah & Company, Ltd, Firm Permit No. 01282, Ramanik Shah, CPA Certificate No. 09193, … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re Trusts Created by Hormel , review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re: Trust of Phyllis Gene Jones, Settlor Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re: The Dale A. Johnson Trust Under Agreement Dated August 10, 2006 as Amended and Restated on … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Sheehy Construction Company v. City of Centerville Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sheehy Construction Company v. City of Centerville Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Once it is determined that collateral estoppel is available, the decision to apply the doctrine is left to the [district] court’s discretion.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Trust Agreement of Eugene L. Johnson u/t/a dated December 22, 2008. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Trust Agreement of Eugene L. Johnson u/t/a dated December 22, 2008. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“It is within the sound and cautiously exercised discretion of the district court whether to award attorney fees and costs from a trust.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In Re: Amendment and Restatement of Revocable Living Trust of Alfred J. Berget dated February 15, 2005. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In Re: Amendment and Restatement of Revocable Living Trust of Alfred J. Berget dated February 15, 2005. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Trust cases often present unique facts and circumstances that are difficult to analogize to other seemingly similar cases.”
In re G.B. Van Dusen Marital Trust 834 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re G.B. Van Dusen Marital Trust 834 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 814 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 814 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
“Whether collateral estoppel is available is *55 a mixed question of law and fact subject to de novo review.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 792 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 792 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“Once it is determined that collateral estoppel is available, the decision to apply the doctrine is left to the [district] court’s discretion.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Pope County Board of Commissioners v. Pryzmus 682 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Pope County Board of Commissioners v. Pryzmus 682 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
is determined that collateral estoppel is available, the decision to apply the doctrine is left to the trial court’s discretion.” .
In Re Ruth Easton Fund 680 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Ruth Easton Fund 680 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Klinefelter v. Crum & Forster Insurance Co. 675 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Klinefelter v. Crum & Forster Insurance Co. 675 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
review denied (Minn. Oct.
In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust of Williams 631 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust of Williams 631 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
§ 501B.79,” citing for this proposition review denied (Minn. Oct.
G.A.W. v. D.M.W. 596 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Gaw v. Dmw 596 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Gaw v. Dmw 596 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(collateral estoppel), review denied (Minn. Oct.
G.A.W. v. D.M.W. 596 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(collateral estoppel), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In Re the Trusteeship of Williams 591 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Collins v. Miller & Miller, Ltd. 943 P.2d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Teaching License of Falgren v. State, Board of Teaching 545 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1996
Teaching License of Falgren v. State, Board of Teaching 545 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1996
“Whether collateral estoppel is available is a mixed question of law and fact subject to de novo review.” pet.
In Re the Trusts: Created by Hormel 543 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Trusts: Created by Hormel 543 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Burgmeier v. Bjur 533 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Burgmeier v. Bjur 533 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Falgren v. STATE, BD. OF TEACHING 529 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Falgren v. STATE, BD. OF TEACHING 529 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
("Whether collateral estoppel is available is a mixed question of law and fact subject to de novo review"), pet.