Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Kinnunen, 502 N.W.2d 773.
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Gregory Gerard McPHEE, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 316696 865 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 2015
-
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Gregory Gerard McPHEE, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 316696
865 N.W.2d 70
Minn. 2015
ount, and failed to cooperate with the Director); (indefinitely suspending an attorney with no right to petition for reinstatement for 2 years when the attorney neglected two clients, made misrepresentations to clients, and failed to cooperate in the disciplinary investigation or appear before the court in the disciplinary case); -75 (Minn. 1993) (indefinitely suspending an attorney with no right to petition for reinstatement for 18 months for neglect of two clients, trust account violations, an
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Fairbairn 802 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 2011
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Fairbairn
802 N.W.2d 734
Minn. 2011
Additionally, “even unintentional misappropriation as the result of poor accounting practices may be grounds for discipline.”
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rebeau 787 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 2010
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rebeau
787 N.W.2d 168
Minn. 2010
The misuse of a trust account is serious and will almost invariably result in a lengthy suspension or disbarment, Overboe, d at 868 (), and the misappropriation of client funds is particularly serious misconduct, usually warranting “disbarment absent clear and convincing evidence of substantial mitigating factors,” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Overboe 745 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 2008
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Overboe
745 N.W.2d 852
Minn. 2008
(internal citations omitted).
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Franklin 726 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 2007
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Franklin
726 N.W.2d 95
Minn. 2007
(suspension for two years for neglect of two client matters and failure to cooperate with the Director); (suspension for 18 months for neglect of a single client matter, failure to communicate, and failure to cooperate with the Director).
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Plummer 725 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 2006
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Plummer 725 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 2006
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Knutson 711 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 2006
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Knutson
711 N.W.2d 807
Minn. 2006
The director requests that Knutson be indefinitely suspended, citing for support and in which attorneys were indefinitely suspended with minimum suspension periods (one year for Jensen; 18 months for Kinnunen) for similar infractions to those at issue here.
- In Re Fagre-Stroetz 710 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2006
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Fagrestroetz 710 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2006
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Fagrestroetz
710 N.W.2d 783
Minn. 2006
We have said that “[w]hen an attorney commits misconduct and then refuses to cooperate with the ensuing investigation, indefinite suspension is ‘a reasonable and necessary sanction, especially where respondent has offered no evidence of mitigating circumstances.’ ” ().
-
In Re Fagre-Stroetz
710 N.W.2d 783
Minn. 2006
We have said that "[w]hen an attorney commits misconduct and then refuses to cooperate with the ensuing investigation, indefinite suspension is `a reasonable and necessary sanction, especially where respondent has offered no evidence of mitigating circumstances.'" ().
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Geiger 621 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 2001
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Geiger 621 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 2001
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Danielson 620 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 2001
-
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Danielson
620 N.W.2d 718
Minn. 2001
When an attorney commits misconduct and then refuses to cooperate with the ensuing investigation, indefinite suspension is “a reasonable and necessary sanction, especially where respondent has offered no evidence of mitigating circumstances.”
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Campbell 603 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1999
-
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Campbell
603 N.W.2d 128
Minn. 1999
See, (neglect of client matters, misrepresentation, trust account violations, misappropriation of client funds, and failure to cooperate with disciplinary proceedings warranted indefinite suspension for a minimum of two years); (neglect of client matters, failure to properly maintain trust account, and failure to cooperate with disciplinary proceedings warranted indefinite suspension for a minimum of 18 months); (neglect of two client matters and failure to cooperate with discipl
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Reiter 567 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1997
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Reiter 567 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1997
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Szymialis 557 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1997
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Szymialis 557 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1997
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Grzybek 552 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1996
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Grzybek 552 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1996
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Montpetit 528 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1995
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Montpetit 528 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1995