Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Thaggard, 527 N.W.2d 804.

68 citing documents.

State v. Edwards 589 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Edwards 589 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(citations and quotations omitted).
State v. Wiernasz 584 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1998
State v. Wiernasz 584 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1998
In fact, while we have condemned police use of lying in interrogating suspects, we have approved the use of polygraph test results in interrogating suspects
Bixler v. State 568 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Bixler v. State 568 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(citing Doan v. State, 306 Minn. 89, 91 , ).
State v. Riley 568 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1997
State v. Riley 568 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1997
State v. Critt 554 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Critt 554 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
The purpose of the recording requirement is to “assist the trial court in the resolution of evidentiary disputes and in more accurately determining the underlying facts.” -08 (Minn. 1995).
State v. Spaeth 552 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1996
State v. Spaeth 552 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1996
State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
568 (1897); -11 (Minn.1995); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282
State v. Wilson 535 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1995
State v. Wilson 535 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1995
In State v. Thaggard, we noted that “[o]ur decision in Scales * * * was prospective in nature, applying to interrogations occurring from the date of filing of our opinion, June 30, 1994.” as amended (Minn., Jan.
State v. Lotton 527 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Lotton 527 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(police should not use trickery or deceit to persuade a criminal suspect to confess to a crime).