Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. Kvamme, 529 N.W.2d 335.

42 citing documents.

Alex Sajady, et al., Appellants, vs. Tracy Sajady, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Alex Sajady, et al., Appellants, vs. Tracy Sajady, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
9(b); -40 (Minn. 1995); Anderson v. Kaliszewski, No. 20-0175, 2020 WL 4932843, *2-3 (Minn. App. Aug.
Russell's Americinn, LLC v. Eagle General Contractors, LLC 772 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Russell's Americinn, LLC v. Eagle General Contractors, LLC 772 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Our conclusion that subdivision 24(a) does not require employment or self-employment is supported by the Minnesota Supreme Court’s
State v. Eakins 720 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Eakins 720 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Statutes are presumptively constitutional and “should be declared unconstitutional only when absolutely necessary.” (quotation omitted).
Clark v. Lindquist 683 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 2004
Clark v. Lindquist 683 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 2004
Everything Etched, Inc. v. Shakopee Towing, Inc. 634 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Everything Etched, Inc. v. Shakopee Towing, Inc. 634 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
City of New Brighton v. 2000 Ford Excursion VIN 1FMNU43S2YEA74156 622 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
City of New Brighton v. 2000 Ford Excursion VIN 1FMNU43S2YEA74156 622 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Rapp 621 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Rapp 621 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Johnson v. 1996 GMC Sierra, VIN: 1GTEK19R4TE551384 606 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Johnson v. 1996 GMC Sierra, VIN: 1GTEK19R4TE551384 606 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hawes v. 1997 Jeep Wrangler, Vin No. 1J4FY29POVP493248, License No. 874 PDG 602 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Hawes v. 1997 Jeep Wrangler, Vin No. 1J4FY29POVP493248, License No. 874 PDG 602 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Lukkason v. 1993 Chevrolet Extended Cab Pickup 590 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Lukkason v. 1993 Chevrolet Extended Cab Pickup 590 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Wright 588 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Wright 588 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 578 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 578 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Although a statute is presumed constitutional, we will declare it unconstitutional “when absolutely necessary.”
Moe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 574 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Moe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 574 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(constitutionality); Hibbing Educ.
Marriage of Murphy v. Murphy 574 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Murphy v. Murphy 574 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co. 572 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co. 572 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Olson v. Ford Motor Co. 558 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1997
Olson v. Ford Motor Co. 558 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1997
Community Bank Henderson v. Noble 552 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Community Bank Henderson v. Noble 552 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
concluded that all retirement plans and contracts are governed by Minn. Stat. § 550.37 , subd.
Cohen v. Little Six, Inc. 543 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cohen v. Little Six, Inc. 543 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Rupp v. Omaha, Indian Tribe, 45 F.3d 1241, 1244 (8th Cir.1995) (reviewing the trial court’s jurisdictional rulings de novo); (evaluating the constitutionality of a statute de novo).
In Re Linehan 544 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re Linehan 544 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Anker v. Little 541 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Anker v. Little 541 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(holding a statute’s constitutionality presents a question of law, which appellate courts evaluate de novo); Hibbing Educ.
State v. Crims 540 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Crims 540 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1995

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by