Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp., 544 N.W.2d 21.

33 citing documents.

Julie Massaquoi v. Abe Al-Qudeh Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Julie Massaquoi v. Abe Al-Qudeh Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(stating that “Minnesota law 5 At oral argument, counsel for the Massaquois conceded that there was no evidence that Al Qudah had knowledge that the Massaquois were advertising and soliciting new clients for their business.
A25-1002 A25-1008 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
18 As a general matter, child abuse and “legal recourse available to [an] abused child” are matters that “are certainly of public concern.” Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
Craig Stevenson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
Byron Johnson v. Kaija Freborg, A21-1531, Supreme Court, September 20, 2023 Minn. 2023
at 875 (d 21, 25 (Minn. 1996) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Byron Johnson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Maethner v. Someplace Safe, Inc. 929 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 2019
Explained Maethner v. Someplace Safe, Inc. 929 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 2019
Ashlee Kay Sames, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp. , Schlieman v. Gannett Minn. Broad.
Michelle Kirchner v. Patricia Jernell, Turpen Realty Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Michelle Kirchner v. Patricia Jernell, Turpen Realty Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(listing elements of defamation claim).
Limberg v. Mitchell 834 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Limberg v. Mitchell 834 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Longbehn v. Schoenrock 727 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Longbehn v. Schoenrock 727 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
25 n. 3 (Minn.1996) (citing Baufield v. Safelite Glass Corp., 831 F.Supp.
Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp. 630 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp. 630 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
It is intended to protect the “justified expectations of the parties to the transaction.” (quotation omitted), rev’d on other grounds
City of Red Wing v. Ellsworth Community School District 617 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
City of Red Wing v. Ellsworth Community School District 617 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-30 (Minn.1996) (where no actual conflict exists between Minnesota and New York law, court "need not reach issue of which law should be applied").
Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 590 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 590 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
1995) (stating better-law factor unnecessary when other factors resolve choice of law), rev’d on other grounds, (Minn.App.
Special Force Ministries v. WCCO Television 584 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Special Force Ministries v. WCCO Television 584 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 582 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1998
Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 582 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1998
Hendry v. Conner, 303 Minn. 317, 319
Deli v. University of Minnesota 578 N.W.2d 779 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Deli v. University of Minnesota 578 N.W.2d 779 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(concluding Minnesota has never recognized cause of action for invasion of privacy); see also Stubbs v. North Mem’l Med.
Manteuffel v. City of North St. Paul 570 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Manteuffel v. City of North St. Paul 570 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 566 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 566 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
This latter category is often referred to as “parasitic” damages in that the emotional distress damages are "insufficient in themselves to make the slander actionable, but once the cause of action is made out without them, they be tacked on as 'parasitic' to it.” (quoting W. Page Keeton, et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts, Sec.