Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. George, 557 N.W.2d 575.

246 citing documents.

State v. Anderson 683 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 2004
State v. Anderson 683 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 2004
State v. Askerooth 681 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 2004
State v. Askerooth 681 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 2004
(noting that “very few drivers can traverse any appreciable distance without violating some traffic regulation” (citations omitted)); Roy Moreland, Some Trends in the Law of Arrest, 39 Minn. L.Rev.
State v. Volkman 675 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Volkman 675 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. BEARDEMPHL 674 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. BEARDEMPHL 674 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
“Ordinarily, if an officer observes a violation of a traffic law, however insignificant, the officer has an objective basis for stopping the vehicle.”
State v. Anderson 671 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Anderson 671 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“Ordinarily, if an officer observes a violation of a traffic law, however insignificant, the officer has an objective basis for stopping the vehicle.”
Yoraway v. Commissioner of Public Safety 669 N.W.2d 622 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Yoraway v. Commissioner of Public Safety 669 N.W.2d 622 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Modaff v. Commissioner of Public Safety 664 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Modaff v. Commissioner of Public Safety 664 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(stating that violation of a traffic statute, no matter how minor, constitutes a valid basis for a stop); Marben v. Dep’t of Pub.
State v. Fort 660 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 2003
State v. Fort 660 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 2003
see also United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-18 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Doren 654 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Doren 654 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Schluter 653 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Schluter 653 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Vereb 643 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Vereb 643 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
The stop must be based on more than a “hunch” and cannot be the “product of mere whim, caprice or idle curiosity.” Pike, d at 921 .
State v. Wagner 637 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Wagner 637 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“Ordinarily, if an officer observes a violation of a traffic law, however insignificant, the officer has an *336 objective basis for stopping the vehicle.” (citations omitted).
Gerding v. Commissioner of Public Safety 628 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Gerding v. Commissioner of Public Safety 628 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(“Ordinarily, if an officer observes a violation of a traffic law, however insignificant, the officer has an objective basis for stopping the vehicle.”).
Schuster v. Commissioner of Public Safety 622 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Schuster v. Commissioner of Public Safety 622 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Wiegand 621 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Wiegand 621 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Anderson 620 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Anderson 620 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Britton 604 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 2000
State v. Britton 604 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 2000
We have stated that a Terry-tjpe stop “must be justified by some objective manifestation that the person stopped is, or is about to be, engaged in criminal activity.” (citing United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Smallwood 594 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1999
State v. Smallwood 594 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1999
A suspect’s voluntary consent to a search is a question subject to “careful appellate review.”
State v. Shellito 594 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Shellito 594 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Harris 590 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1999
State v. Harris 590 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1999
State v. Fisher 588 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Fisher 588 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(stating clearly erroneous standard is applied in reviewing findings of fact relating to Fourth Amendment suppression issue).
State v. Harris 572 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Harris 572 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Battleson 567 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Battleson 567 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1997