Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wall v. Fairview Hospital & Healthcare Services, 584 N.W.2d 395.

31 citing documents.

Chad Darwin Koetz, Trustee for the Heirs and Next-of-Kin of Gloria Lynn Koetz, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Kimberly Kay Mountjoy, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
2700 Hennepin LLC v. VPC Minneapolis Uptown Pizza, LLC, VPC Pizza Operating Corp., ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
2700 Hennepin LLC v. VPC Minneapolis Uptown Pizza, LLC, VPC Pizza Operating Corp., ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
& Healthcare Servs., (“If the record were to remain open after summary judgment, a ruling on a pretrial summary judgment motion would be subject to continued changes throughout the course of litigation as new evidence was discovered and submitted.”); (stating that an
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
William Hansen d/b/a W.G. Hansen & Associates, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
& Healthcare Servs., (“To allow trial testimony to form the basis of a claim after the court has already ruled that the claim may not go forward would undermine the purpose of summary judgment.”).
Morgan-Walg, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sumi Mukherjee, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
& Healthcare Servs., (adopting the criminal-law definition of “reasonable cause” to a civil statute that mandated reporting requirements of vulnerable adults based on “reasonable cause ”).
Greg Peterson, Souphanny Dean, Co-Appellant, Brian Rogge v. City of Richfield, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Greg Peterson, Souphanny Dean, Co-Appellant, Brian Rogge v. City of Richfield, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
& Healthcare Servs., d 395, 404 (Minn. 1998).
State of Minnesota v. Michelle MacDonald Shimota 875 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michelle MacDonald Shimota 875 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
& Healthcare Servs., n.2 (Minn. 1998).
Glendalough Homeowners' Association v. Jovani Nassar, and third party v. Evermoor Community Association, third party Community Development, Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Glendalough Homeowners' Association v. Jovani Nassar, and third party v. Evermoor Community Association, third party Community Development, Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
& Healthcare Servs., (rejecting argument that appellate court “should consider the entire trial record and not merely the evidence before the district court at summary judgment”).
James F. Christie v. Estate of Dilman Christie, Charles Christie Minn. Ct. App. 2015
James F. Christie v. Estate of Dilman Christie, Charles Christie Minn. Ct. App. 2015
& Healthcare Servs., (quotation omitted) (“A district court may grant a motion for [JMOL] when, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to present a question of fact to the jury.”).
In Re the Temporary Immediate Suspension of the Family Child Care License of Strecker 777 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re the Temporary Immediate Suspension of the Family Child Care License of Strecker 777 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
& Healthcare Servs., is instructive.
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. 761 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. 761 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
& Healthcare Services, (“[Mjore than 40 years ago, we held that partial satisfaction from one joint tortfea-sor does not prevent recovery from another joint tortfeasor.”); Liberty Mut.
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 711 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 2006
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 711 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 2006
Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester 690 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2005
Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester 690 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2005
and Healthcare Servs., (psychologist and psychotherapist not qualified to provide expert opinion about the appropriate standard of care for a psychiatric nurse); (expert medical witnesses must have both sufficient scientific knowledge and practical experience with res
Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc. 663 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2003
Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc. 663 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2003
& Healthcare Servs., ("To establish a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress, a plaintiff must show that she was within a zone of danger of physical impact, reasonably feared for her safety, and suffered severe emotional distress with accompanying physical manifestations.”); see, e.g., Navarre v. S. Washingt
Kaiser-Bauer v. Mullan 609 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Kaiser-Bauer v. Mullan 609 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Alsides v. Brown Institute, Ltd. 592 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Alsides v. Brown Institute, Ltd. 592 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
& Healthcare Servs., (refusing to address issue of costs and disbursements after reversing and remanding because “[t]rial is not yet completed and no one is yet the ‘prevailing party.’ ” (citation omitted)), rev’d in part on other grounds

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by